Skip to Content
Main content

WOODLANDS MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

64
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

73

34%

LEVEL 2

78

36%

LEVEL 3

52

24%

LEVEL 4

12

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

43
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

105

45%

LEVEL 2

87

37%

LEVEL 3

38

16%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

31
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 97

LEVEL 1

29

30%

LEVEL 2

37

38%

LEVEL 3

26

27%

LEVEL 4

5

5%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

21
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

36

35%

LEVEL 2

45

44%

LEVEL 3

19

19%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

33
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

44

37%

LEVEL 2

41

35%

LEVEL 3

26

22%

LEVEL 4

7

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

22
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

69

52%

LEVEL 2

42

32%

LEVEL 3

19

14%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

9
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

1

5%

LEVEL 2

10

50%

LEVEL 3

9

45%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

12
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

1

5%

LEVEL 2

6

32%

LEVEL 3

9

47%

LEVEL 4

3

16%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

12
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

6

26%

LEVEL 2

5

22%

LEVEL 3

9

39%

LEVEL 4

3

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

24
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

43

40%

LEVEL 2

40

37%

LEVEL 3

21

20%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

9
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

52

50%

LEVEL 2

44

42%

LEVEL 3

8

8%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

20
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

26

37%

LEVEL 2

25

35%

LEVEL 3

17

24%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

13
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

46

53%

LEVEL 2

28

32%

LEVEL 3

12

14%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

62
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

50

28%

LEVEL 2

69

38%

LEVEL 3

50

28%

LEVEL 4

12

7%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

42
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

69

36%

LEVEL 2

83

43%

LEVEL 3

37

19%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

23

68%

LEVEL 2

9

26%

LEVEL 3

2

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

36

88%

LEVEL 2

4

10%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

64
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

63

31%

LEVEL 2

76

37%

LEVEL 3

52

26%

LEVEL 4

12

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

42
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

93

42%

LEVEL 2

86

39%

LEVEL 3

37

17%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

10

83%

LEVEL 2

2

17%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

12

86%

LEVEL 2

1

7%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

31
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

19

23%

LEVEL 2

33

40%

LEVEL 3

24

29%

LEVEL 4

7

8%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

23

25%

LEVEL 2

36

40%

LEVEL 3

28

31%

LEVEL 4

4

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

33
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

54

41%

LEVEL 2

45

34%

LEVEL 3

28

21%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

11
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

82

57%

LEVEL 2

51

35%

LEVEL 3

10

7%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.