RED CREEK CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

103
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 401

LEVEL 1

157

39%

LEVEL 2

141

35%

LEVEL 3

76

19%

LEVEL 4

27

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

98
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 362

LEVEL 1

152

42%

LEVEL 2

112

31%

LEVEL 3

73

20%

LEVEL 4

25

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

54
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

50

29%

LEVEL 2

71

41%

LEVEL 3

32

18%

LEVEL 4

22

13%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

51
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

49

31%

LEVEL 2

58

37%

LEVEL 3

36

23%

LEVEL 4

15

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

49
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 226

LEVEL 1

107

47%

LEVEL 2

70

31%

LEVEL 3

44

19%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

47
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 204

LEVEL 1

103

50%

LEVEL 2

54

26%

LEVEL 3

37

18%

LEVEL 4

10

5%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

103
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 390

LEVEL 1

148

38%

LEVEL 2

139

36%

LEVEL 3

76

19%

LEVEL 4

27

7%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

97
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 346

LEVEL 1

142

41%

LEVEL 2

107

31%

LEVEL 3

72

21%

LEVEL 4

25

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

4

80%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

4

67%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

4

67%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

101
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 323

LEVEL 1

84

26%

LEVEL 2

138

43%

LEVEL 3

74

23%

LEVEL 4

27

8%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

97
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 290

LEVEL 1

87

30%

LEVEL 2

106

37%

LEVEL 3

72

25%

LEVEL 4

25

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

73

94%

LEVEL 2

3

4%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

65

90%

LEVEL 2

6

8%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

72
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

42

24%

LEVEL 2

64

36%

LEVEL 3

51

29%

LEVEL 4

21

12%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

69
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

45

30%

LEVEL 2

38

25%

LEVEL 3

48

32%

LEVEL 4

21

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

31
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

115

52%

LEVEL 2

77

35%

LEVEL 3

25

11%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

29
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

107

51%

LEVEL 2

74

35%

LEVEL 3

25

12%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.