GLENS FALLS CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

234
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 852

LEVEL 1

283

33%

LEVEL 2

335

39%

LEVEL 3

182

21%

LEVEL 4

52

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

232
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 802

LEVEL 1

261

33%

LEVEL 2

309

39%

LEVEL 3

162

20%

LEVEL 4

70

9%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

127
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 408

LEVEL 1

115

28%

LEVEL 2

166

41%

LEVEL 3

98

24%

LEVEL 4

29

7%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

124
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 379

LEVEL 1

103

27%

LEVEL 2

152

40%

LEVEL 3

82

22%

LEVEL 4

42

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

107
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 444

LEVEL 1

168

38%

LEVEL 2

169

38%

LEVEL 3

84

19%

LEVEL 4

23

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

108
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 423

LEVEL 1

158

37%

LEVEL 2

157

37%

LEVEL 3

80

19%

LEVEL 4

28

7%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

8

35%

LEVEL 2

10

43%

LEVEL 3

4

17%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

12

43%

LEVEL 2

12

43%

LEVEL 3

3

11%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

210
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 754

LEVEL 1

241

32%

LEVEL 2

303

40%

LEVEL 3

162

21%

LEVEL 4

48

6%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

211
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 717

LEVEL 1

227

32%

LEVEL 2

279

39%

LEVEL 3

148

21%

LEVEL 4

63

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

14

54%

LEVEL 2

8

31%

LEVEL 3

4

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

9

45%

LEVEL 2

8

40%

LEVEL 3

3

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

15

48%

LEVEL 2

8

26%

LEVEL 3

6

19%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

11

52%

LEVEL 2

4

19%

LEVEL 3

4

19%

LEVEL 4

2

10%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

230
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 692

LEVEL 1

156

23%

LEVEL 2

306

44%

LEVEL 3

179

26%

LEVEL 4

51

7%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

228
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 667

LEVEL 1

153

23%

LEVEL 2

286

43%

LEVEL 3

159

24%

LEVEL 4

69

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 160

LEVEL 1

127

79%

LEVEL 2

29

18%

LEVEL 3

3

2%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

108

80%

LEVEL 2

23

17%

LEVEL 3

3

2%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

161
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 473

LEVEL 1

111

23%

LEVEL 2

201

42%

LEVEL 3

121

26%

LEVEL 4

40

8%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

179
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 441

LEVEL 1

87

20%

LEVEL 2

175

40%

LEVEL 3

120

27%

LEVEL 4

59

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

73
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 379

LEVEL 1

172

45%

LEVEL 2

134

35%

LEVEL 3

61

16%

LEVEL 4

12

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

53
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 361

LEVEL 1

174

48%

LEVEL 2

134

37%

LEVEL 3

42

12%

LEVEL 4

11

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.