Skip to Content
Main content

M CLIFFORD MILLER MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

157
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 756

LEVEL 1

334

44%

LEVEL 2

265

35%

LEVEL 3

108

14%

LEVEL 4

49

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

75
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 399

LEVEL 1

206

52%

LEVEL 2

118

30%

LEVEL 3

55

14%

LEVEL 4

20

5%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

97
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 379

LEVEL 1

135

36%

LEVEL 2

147

39%

LEVEL 3

62

16%

LEVEL 4

35

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

46
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

74

42%

LEVEL 2

57

32%

LEVEL 3

33

19%

LEVEL 4

13

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

60
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 377

LEVEL 1

199

53%

LEVEL 2

118

31%

LEVEL 3

46

12%

LEVEL 4

14

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

29
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

132

59%

LEVEL 2

61

27%

LEVEL 3

22

10%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

8
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

18

43%

LEVEL 2

16

38%

LEVEL 3

6

14%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

17

65%

LEVEL 2

2

8%

LEVEL 3

5

19%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

10
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

7

41%

LEVEL 3

5

29%

LEVEL 4

5

29%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

114
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 441

LEVEL 1

170

39%

LEVEL 2

157

36%

LEVEL 3

76

17%

LEVEL 4

38

9%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

51
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

94

43%

LEVEL 2

73

33%

LEVEL 3

40

18%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

8
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

93

65%

LEVEL 2

43

30%

LEVEL 3

7

5%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

61

79%

LEVEL 2

16

21%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

16
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

51

48%

LEVEL 2

40

37%

LEVEL 3

13

12%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

34

56%

LEVEL 2

20

33%

LEVEL 3

5

8%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

151
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 565

LEVEL 1

177

31%

LEVEL 2

237

42%

LEVEL 3

102

18%

LEVEL 4

49

9%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

74
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 291

LEVEL 1

108

37%

LEVEL 2

109

37%

LEVEL 3

55

19%

LEVEL 4

19

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

157

82%

LEVEL 2

28

15%

LEVEL 3

6

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 108

LEVEL 1

98

91%

LEVEL 2

9

8%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

98
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 285

LEVEL 1

82

29%

LEVEL 2

105

37%

LEVEL 3

61

21%

LEVEL 4

37

13%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

50
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

47

31%

LEVEL 2

56

37%

LEVEL 3

37

24%

LEVEL 4

13

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

59
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 471

LEVEL 1

252

54%

LEVEL 2

160

34%

LEVEL 3

47

10%

LEVEL 4

12

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

25
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 246

LEVEL 1

159

65%

LEVEL 2

62

25%

LEVEL 3

18

7%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.