Skip to Content
Main content

NEWFIELD CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

91
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 351

LEVEL 1

153

44%

LEVEL 2

107

30%

LEVEL 3

70

20%

LEVEL 4

21

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

61
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 292

LEVEL 1

128

44%

LEVEL 2

103

35%

LEVEL 3

51

17%

LEVEL 4

10

3%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

54
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

56

35%

LEVEL 2

48

30%

LEVEL 3

41

26%

LEVEL 4

13

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

40
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

50

35%

LEVEL 2

54

38%

LEVEL 3

33

23%

LEVEL 4

7

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

37
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

97

50%

LEVEL 2

59

31%

LEVEL 3

29

15%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

21
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

78

53%

LEVEL 2

49

33%

LEVEL 3

18

12%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

83
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 319

LEVEL 1

136

43%

LEVEL 2

100

31%

LEVEL 3

64

20%

LEVEL 4

19

6%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

56
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 263

LEVEL 1

113

43%

LEVEL 2

94

36%

LEVEL 3

47

18%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

13

59%

LEVEL 2

5

23%

LEVEL 3

4

18%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

11

55%

LEVEL 2

6

30%

LEVEL 3

2

10%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

88
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

79

30%

LEVEL 2

100

37%

LEVEL 3

67

25%

LEVEL 4

21

8%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

59
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

73

32%

LEVEL 2

99

43%

LEVEL 3

49

21%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

74

88%

LEVEL 2

7

8%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

55

90%

LEVEL 2

4

7%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

51
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

53

37%

LEVEL 2

41

28%

LEVEL 3

36

25%

LEVEL 4

15

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

36
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

42

33%

LEVEL 2

48

38%

LEVEL 3

29

23%

LEVEL 4

7

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

40
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

100

49%

LEVEL 2

66

32%

LEVEL 3

34

17%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

25
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

86

52%

LEVEL 2

55

33%

LEVEL 3

22

13%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.