Skip to Content
Main content

BOYNTON MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

252
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 524

LEVEL 1

107

20%

LEVEL 2

165

31%

LEVEL 3

159

30%

LEVEL 4

93

18%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

224
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 440

LEVEL 1

86

20%

LEVEL 2

130

30%

LEVEL 3

138

31%

LEVEL 4

86

20%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

132
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 256

LEVEL 1

47

18%

LEVEL 2

77

30%

LEVEL 3

79

31%

LEVEL 4

53

21%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

126
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

35

17%

LEVEL 2

49

23%

LEVEL 3

73

35%

LEVEL 4

53

25%

MALE

PROFICIENT

120
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 268

LEVEL 1

60

22%

LEVEL 2

88

33%

LEVEL 3

80

30%

LEVEL 4

40

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

98
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

51

22%

LEVEL 2

81

35%

LEVEL 3

65

28%

LEVEL 4

33

14%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

31
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

8

20%

LEVEL 3

15

38%

LEVEL 4

16

40%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

27
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

7

21%

LEVEL 3

15

44%

LEVEL 4

12

35%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

195
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 374

LEVEL 1

60

16%

LEVEL 2

119

32%

LEVEL 3

124

33%

LEVEL 4

71

19%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

173
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 321

LEVEL 1

55

17%

LEVEL 2

93

29%

LEVEL 3

111

35%

LEVEL 4

62

19%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

14
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

30

42%

LEVEL 2

27

38%

LEVEL 3

11

15%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

7
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

23

46%

LEVEL 2

20

40%

LEVEL 3

3

6%

LEVEL 4

4

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

11

46%

LEVEL 2

7

29%

LEVEL 3

6

25%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

4

22%

LEVEL 2

6

33%

LEVEL 3

5

28%

LEVEL 4

3

17%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

250
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 464

LEVEL 1

62

13%

LEVEL 2

152

33%

LEVEL 3

157

34%

LEVEL 4

93

20%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

222
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 399

LEVEL 1

56

14%

LEVEL 2

121

30%

LEVEL 3

137

34%

LEVEL 4

85

21%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

45

75%

LEVEL 2

13

22%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

30

73%

LEVEL 2

9

22%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

222
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 345

LEVEL 1

30

9%

LEVEL 2

93

27%

LEVEL 3

139

40%

LEVEL 4

83

24%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

191
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 295

LEVEL 1

25

8%

LEVEL 2

79

27%

LEVEL 3

113

38%

LEVEL 4

78

26%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

30
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

77

43%

LEVEL 2

72

40%

LEVEL 3

20

11%

LEVEL 4

10

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

33
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

61

42%

LEVEL 2

51

35%

LEVEL 3

25

17%

LEVEL 4

8

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.