Skip to Content
Main content

TRI-VALLEY CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

104
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 473

LEVEL 1

193

41%

LEVEL 2

176

37%

LEVEL 3

78

16%

LEVEL 4

26

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

76
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 300

LEVEL 1

127

42%

LEVEL 2

97

32%

LEVEL 3

59

20%

LEVEL 4

17

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

53
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

73

35%

LEVEL 2

82

39%

LEVEL 3

38

18%

LEVEL 4

15

7%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

34
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

54

40%

LEVEL 2

47

35%

LEVEL 3

26

19%

LEVEL 4

8

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

51
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 265

LEVEL 1

120

45%

LEVEL 2

94

35%

LEVEL 3

40

15%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

42
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

73

44%

LEVEL 2

50

30%

LEVEL 3

33

20%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

6

67%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

WHITE

PROFICIENT

98
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 433

LEVEL 1

170

39%

LEVEL 2

165

38%

LEVEL 3

73

17%

LEVEL 4

25

6%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

73
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 266

LEVEL 1

111

42%

LEVEL 2

82

31%

LEVEL 3

56

21%

LEVEL 4

17

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

3

38%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

13

65%

LEVEL 2

5

25%

LEVEL 3

2

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

7

41%

LEVEL 2

9

53%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

104
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 406

LEVEL 1

129

32%

LEVEL 2

173

43%

LEVEL 3

78

19%

LEVEL 4

26

6%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

76
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 250

LEVEL 1

80

32%

LEVEL 2

94

38%

LEVEL 3

59

24%

LEVEL 4

17

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

64

96%

LEVEL 2

3

4%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

47

94%

LEVEL 2

3

6%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

77
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 238

LEVEL 1

58

24%

LEVEL 2

103

43%

LEVEL 3

58

24%

LEVEL 4

19

8%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

55
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

35

25%

LEVEL 2

52

37%

LEVEL 3

41

29%

LEVEL 4

14

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

27
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

135

57%

LEVEL 2

73

31%

LEVEL 3

20

9%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

21
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

92

58%

LEVEL 2

45

28%

LEVEL 3

18

11%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.