Skip to Content
Main content

OLDFIELD MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

461
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 791

LEVEL 1

57

7%

LEVEL 2

273

35%

LEVEL 3

298

38%

LEVEL 4

163

21%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

309
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 561

LEVEL 1

74

13%

LEVEL 2

178

32%

LEVEL 3

216

39%

LEVEL 4

93

17%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

252
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 399

LEVEL 1

20

5%

LEVEL 2

127

32%

LEVEL 3

147

37%

LEVEL 4

105

26%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

172
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 289

LEVEL 1

32

11%

LEVEL 2

85

29%

LEVEL 3

110

38%

LEVEL 4

62

21%

MALE

PROFICIENT

209
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 392

LEVEL 1

37

9%

LEVEL 2

146

37%

LEVEL 3

151

39%

LEVEL 4

58

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

137
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 272

LEVEL 1

42

15%

LEVEL 2

93

34%

LEVEL 3

106

39%

LEVEL 4

31

11%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

21
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

2

6%

LEVEL 2

11

32%

LEVEL 3

14

41%

LEVEL 4

7

21%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

15
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

3

11%

LEVEL 2

10

36%

LEVEL 3

11

39%

LEVEL 4

4

14%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

392
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 644

LEVEL 1

35

5%

LEVEL 2

217

34%

LEVEL 3

253

39%

LEVEL 4

139

22%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

265
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 449

LEVEL 1

47

10%

LEVEL 2

137

31%

LEVEL 3

182

41%

LEVEL 4

83

18%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

7
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

12

35%

LEVEL 2

15

44%

LEVEL 3

6

18%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

10

42%

LEVEL 2

8

33%

LEVEL 3

5

21%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

32
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

8

12%

LEVEL 2

25

38%

LEVEL 3

21

32%

LEVEL 4

11

17%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

18
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

11

23%

LEVEL 2

19

40%

LEVEL 3

15

31%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

446
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 670

LEVEL 1

16

2%

LEVEL 2

208

31%

LEVEL 3

283

42%

LEVEL 4

163

24%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

308
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 488

LEVEL 1

31

6%

LEVEL 2

149

31%

LEVEL 3

215

44%

LEVEL 4

93

19%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

15
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

41

34%

LEVEL 2

65

54%

LEVEL 3

15

12%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

43

59%

LEVEL 2

29

40%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

448
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 720

LEVEL 1

41

6%

LEVEL 2

231

32%

LEVEL 3

288

40%

LEVEL 4

160

22%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

292
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 486

LEVEL 1

42

9%

LEVEL 2

152

31%

LEVEL 3

202

42%

LEVEL 4

90

19%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

13
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

16

23%

LEVEL 2

42

59%

LEVEL 3

10

14%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

17
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

32

43%

LEVEL 2

26

35%

LEVEL 3

14

19%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.