THOMAS J LAHEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

399
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 739

LEVEL 1

88

12%

LEVEL 2

252

34%

LEVEL 3

303

41%

LEVEL 4

96

13%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

281
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 498

LEVEL 1

53

11%

LEVEL 2

164

33%

LEVEL 3

216

43%

LEVEL 4

65

13%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

201
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 367

LEVEL 1

37

10%

LEVEL 2

129

35%

LEVEL 3

143

39%

LEVEL 4

58

16%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

155
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 244

LEVEL 1

17

7%

LEVEL 2

72

30%

LEVEL 3

108

44%

LEVEL 4

47

19%

MALE

PROFICIENT

198
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 372

LEVEL 1

51

14%

LEVEL 2

123

33%

LEVEL 3

160

43%

LEVEL 4

38

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

126
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 254

LEVEL 1

36

14%

LEVEL 2

92

36%

LEVEL 3

108

43%

LEVEL 4

18

7%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

19
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

13

41%

LEVEL 3

15

47%

LEVEL 4

4

13%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

17
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

4

13%

LEVEL 2

10

32%

LEVEL 3

11

35%

LEVEL 4

6

19%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

329
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 593

LEVEL 1

61

10%

LEVEL 2

203

34%

LEVEL 3

249

42%

LEVEL 4

80

13%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

219
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 362

LEVEL 1

28

8%

LEVEL 2

115

32%

LEVEL 3

170

47%

LEVEL 4

49

14%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

9
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

12

38%

LEVEL 2

11

34%

LEVEL 3

6

19%

LEVEL 4

3

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

9
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

9

31%

LEVEL 2

11

38%

LEVEL 3

7

24%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

26
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

12

21%

LEVEL 2

20

34%

LEVEL 3

22

38%

LEVEL 4

4

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

21
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

11

21%

LEVEL 2

20

38%

LEVEL 3

16

31%

LEVEL 4

5

10%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

385
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 628

LEVEL 1

31

5%

LEVEL 2

212

34%

LEVEL 3

291

46%

LEVEL 4

94

15%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

276
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 454

LEVEL 1

33

7%

LEVEL 2

145

32%

LEVEL 3

211

46%

LEVEL 4

65

14%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

14
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

57

51%

LEVEL 2

40

36%

LEVEL 3

12

11%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

20

45%

LEVEL 2

19

43%

LEVEL 3

5

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

385
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 666

LEVEL 1

58

9%

LEVEL 2

223

33%

LEVEL 3

291

44%

LEVEL 4

94

14%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

259
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 427

LEVEL 1

30

7%

LEVEL 2

138

32%

LEVEL 3

199

47%

LEVEL 4

60

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

14
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

30

41%

LEVEL 2

29

40%

LEVEL 3

12

16%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

22
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

23

32%

LEVEL 2

26

37%

LEVEL 3

17

24%

LEVEL 4

5

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.