COLD SPRING HARBOR CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

470
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 898

LEVEL 1

84

9%

LEVEL 2

344

38%

LEVEL 3

360

40%

LEVEL 4

110

12%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

393
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 711

LEVEL 1

67

9%

LEVEL 2

251

35%

LEVEL 3

280

39%

LEVEL 4

113

16%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

251
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 429

LEVEL 1

31

7%

LEVEL 2

147

34%

LEVEL 3

186

43%

LEVEL 4

65

15%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

204
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 329

LEVEL 1

21

6%

LEVEL 2

104

32%

LEVEL 3

139

42%

LEVEL 4

65

20%

MALE

PROFICIENT

219
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 469

LEVEL 1

53

11%

LEVEL 2

197

42%

LEVEL 3

174

37%

LEVEL 4

45

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

189
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 382

LEVEL 1

46

12%

LEVEL 2

147

38%

LEVEL 3

141

37%

LEVEL 4

48

13%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

2

29%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

21
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

8

27%

LEVEL 3

17

57%

LEVEL 4

4

13%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

22
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

2

6%

LEVEL 2

7

23%

LEVEL 3

13

42%

LEVEL 4

9

29%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

433
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 831

LEVEL 1

76

9%

LEVEL 2

322

39%

LEVEL 3

329

40%

LEVEL 4

104

13%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

354
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 645

LEVEL 1

59

9%

LEVEL 2

232

36%

LEVEL 3

257

40%

LEVEL 4

97

15%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

13
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

5

18%

LEVEL 2

10

36%

LEVEL 3

11

39%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

11
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

3

14%

LEVEL 2

8

36%

LEVEL 3

7

32%

LEVEL 4

4

18%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

461
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 809

LEVEL 1

40

5%

LEVEL 2

308

38%

LEVEL 3

351

43%

LEVEL 4

110

14%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

388
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 648

LEVEL 1

28

4%

LEVEL 2

232

36%

LEVEL 3

276

43%

LEVEL 4

112

17%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

44

49%

LEVEL 2

36

40%

LEVEL 3

9

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

39

62%

LEVEL 2

19

30%

LEVEL 3

4

6%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

469
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 892

LEVEL 1

83

9%

LEVEL 2

340

38%

LEVEL 3

359

40%

LEVEL 4

110

12%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

392
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 706

LEVEL 1

65

9%

LEVEL 2

249

35%

LEVEL 3

280

40%

LEVEL 4

112

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

4

67%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.