Skip to Content
Main content

MILTON L OLIVE MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

31
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 418

LEVEL 1

266

64%

LEVEL 2

121

29%

LEVEL 3

24

6%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

18
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 415

LEVEL 1

307

74%

LEVEL 2

90

22%

LEVEL 3

17

4%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

23
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

118

52%

LEVEL 2

87

38%

LEVEL 3

17

7%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

16
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

146

68%

LEVEL 2

52

24%

LEVEL 3

15

7%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

MALE

PROFICIENT

8
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

148

78%

LEVEL 2

34

18%

LEVEL 3

7

4%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

2
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

161

80%

LEVEL 2

38

19%

LEVEL 3

2

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

15
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 247

LEVEL 1

167

68%

LEVEL 2

65

26%

LEVEL 3

10

4%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

13
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 247

LEVEL 1

193

78%

LEVEL 2

41

17%

LEVEL 3

13

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

15
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

97

59%

LEVEL 2

52

32%

LEVEL 3

13

8%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

111

68%

LEVEL 2

47

29%

LEVEL 3

4

2%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

29
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 308

LEVEL 1

168

55%

LEVEL 2

111

36%

LEVEL 3

22

7%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

18
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 318

LEVEL 1

213

67%

LEVEL 2

87

27%

LEVEL 3

17

5%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

98

89%

LEVEL 2

10

9%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 97

LEVEL 1

94

97%

LEVEL 2

3

3%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

31
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 363

LEVEL 1

214

59%

LEVEL 2

118

33%

LEVEL 3

24

7%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

18
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 358

LEVEL 1

251

70%

LEVEL 2

89

25%

LEVEL 3

17

5%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

52

95%

LEVEL 2

3

5%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

56

98%

LEVEL 2

1

2%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

5
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

9

43%

LEVEL 2

7

33%

LEVEL 3

3

14%

LEVEL 4

2

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

17

74%

LEVEL 2

3

13%

LEVEL 3

3

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

26
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 397

LEVEL 1

257

65%

LEVEL 2

114

29%

LEVEL 3

21

5%

LEVEL 4

5

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

15
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 392

LEVEL 1

290

74%

LEVEL 2

87

22%

LEVEL 3

14

4%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.