Skip to Content
Main content

WILLIAM RALL SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

93
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 263

LEVEL 1

64

24%

LEVEL 2

106

40%

LEVEL 3

74

28%

LEVEL 4

19

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

35
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

26

25%

LEVEL 2

44

42%

LEVEL 3

25

24%

LEVEL 4

10

10%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

51
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

25

18%

LEVEL 2

62

45%

LEVEL 3

41

30%

LEVEL 4

10

7%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

18
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

8

16%

LEVEL 2

24

48%

LEVEL 3

13

26%

LEVEL 4

5

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

42
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 125

LEVEL 1

39

31%

LEVEL 2

44

35%

LEVEL 3

33

26%

LEVEL 4

9

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

17
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

18

33%

LEVEL 2

20

36%

LEVEL 3

12

22%

LEVEL 4

5

9%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

7
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

1

8%

LEVEL 2

5

38%

LEVEL 3

4

31%

LEVEL 4

3

23%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

3
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

2

33%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

63
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

31

19%

LEVEL 2

65

41%

LEVEL 3

50

31%

LEVEL 4

13

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

22
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

7

15%

LEVEL 2

19

40%

LEVEL 3

18

38%

LEVEL 4

4

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

19
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

30

38%

LEVEL 2

30

38%

LEVEL 3

18

23%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

9
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

18

39%

LEVEL 2

19

41%

LEVEL 3

6

13%

LEVEL 4

3

7%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

93
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

44

19%

LEVEL 2

100

42%

LEVEL 3

74

31%

LEVEL 4

19

8%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

34
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 98

LEVEL 1

23

23%

LEVEL 2

41

42%

LEVEL 3

24

24%

LEVEL 4

10

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

20

77%

LEVEL 2

6

23%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

92
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

57

23%

LEVEL 2

102

41%

LEVEL 3

73

29%

LEVEL 4

19

8%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

35
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 97

LEVEL 1

21

22%

LEVEL 2

41

42%

LEVEL 3

25

26%

LEVEL 4

10

10%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

7

58%

LEVEL 2

4

33%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

5

63%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

66
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

23

16%

LEVEL 2

59

40%

LEVEL 3

54

36%

LEVEL 4

12

8%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

19
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

12

25%

LEVEL 2

17

35%

LEVEL 3

13

27%

LEVEL 4

6

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

27
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

41

36%

LEVEL 2

47

41%

LEVEL 3

20

17%

LEVEL 4

7

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

16
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

14

25%

LEVEL 2

27

47%

LEVEL 3

12

21%

LEVEL 4

4

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.