Skip to Content
Main content

TUSCARORA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

57
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 302

LEVEL 1

116

38%

LEVEL 2

129

43%

LEVEL 3

44

15%

LEVEL 4

13

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

48
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

113

44%

LEVEL 2

94

37%

LEVEL 3

35

14%

LEVEL 4

13

5%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

36
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

47

31%

LEVEL 2

68

45%

LEVEL 3

26

17%

LEVEL 4

10

7%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

33
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

52

38%

LEVEL 2

51

38%

LEVEL 3

22

16%

LEVEL 4

11

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

21
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

69

46%

LEVEL 2

61

40%

LEVEL 3

18

12%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

15
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 119

LEVEL 1

61

51%

LEVEL 2

43

36%

LEVEL 3

13

11%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

WHITE

PROFICIENT

55
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 290

LEVEL 1

111

38%

LEVEL 2

124

43%

LEVEL 3

43

15%

LEVEL 4

12

4%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

46
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

105

43%

LEVEL 2

92

38%

LEVEL 3

34

14%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

57
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 261

LEVEL 1

82

31%

LEVEL 2

122

47%

LEVEL 3

44

17%

LEVEL 4

13

5%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

48
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 224

LEVEL 1

84

38%

LEVEL 2

92

41%

LEVEL 3

35

16%

LEVEL 4

13

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

34

83%

LEVEL 2

7

17%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

29

94%

LEVEL 2

2

6%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

25

21%

LEVEL 2

60

51%

LEVEL 3

26

22%

LEVEL 4

6

5%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

30
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

34

32%

LEVEL 2

42

40%

LEVEL 3

22

21%

LEVEL 4

8

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

25
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

91

49%

LEVEL 2

69

37%

LEVEL 3

18

10%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

18
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

79

53%

LEVEL 2

52

35%

LEVEL 3

13

9%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.