JESSIE T ZOLLER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

57
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 340

LEVEL 1

148

44%

LEVEL 2

135

40%

LEVEL 3

44

13%

LEVEL 4

13

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

47
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 313

LEVEL 1

167

53%

LEVEL 2

99

32%

LEVEL 3

39

12%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

32
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

68

41%

LEVEL 2

67

40%

LEVEL 3

24

14%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

29
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

71

49%

LEVEL 2

44

31%

LEVEL 3

23

16%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

25
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

80

46%

LEVEL 2

68

39%

LEVEL 3

20

12%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

18
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

96

57%

LEVEL 2

55

33%

LEVEL 3

16

9%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

4

67%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

10
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

12

24%

LEVEL 2

27

55%

LEVEL 3

7

14%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

11
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

17

35%

LEVEL 2

21

43%

LEVEL 3

10

20%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

33
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

50

36%

LEVEL 2

54

39%

LEVEL 3

24

18%

LEVEL 4

9

7%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

18
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 123

LEVEL 1

63

51%

LEVEL 2

42

34%

LEVEL 3

14

11%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

9
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

55

54%

LEVEL 2

38

37%

LEVEL 3

8

8%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

10
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

55

63%

LEVEL 2

22

25%

LEVEL 3

9

10%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

28

58%

LEVEL 2

14

29%

LEVEL 3

4

8%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

56
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 289

LEVEL 1

105

36%

LEVEL 2

128

44%

LEVEL 3

43

15%

LEVEL 4

13

4%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

47
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 260

LEVEL 1

119

46%

LEVEL 2

94

36%

LEVEL 3

39

15%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

43

84%

LEVEL 2

7

14%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

48

91%

LEVEL 2

5

9%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

16

19%

LEVEL 2

36

43%

LEVEL 3

21

25%

LEVEL 4

11

13%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

21
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 82

LEVEL 1

26

32%

LEVEL 2

35

43%

LEVEL 3

16

20%

LEVEL 4

5

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

25
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 256

LEVEL 1

132

52%

LEVEL 2

99

39%

LEVEL 3

23

9%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

26
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

141

61%

LEVEL 2

64

28%

LEVEL 3

23

10%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.