OLIVER W WINCH MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

221
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 688

LEVEL 1

166

24%

LEVEL 2

301

44%

LEVEL 3

151

22%

LEVEL 4

70

10%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

194
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 604

LEVEL 1

159

26%

LEVEL 2

251

42%

LEVEL 3

135

22%

LEVEL 4

59

10%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

126
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 333

LEVEL 1

69

21%

LEVEL 2

138

41%

LEVEL 3

81

24%

LEVEL 4

45

14%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

117
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 293

LEVEL 1

54

18%

LEVEL 2

122

42%

LEVEL 3

79

27%

LEVEL 4

38

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

95
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 355

LEVEL 1

97

27%

LEVEL 2

163

46%

LEVEL 3

70

20%

LEVEL 4

25

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

77
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 311

LEVEL 1

105

34%

LEVEL 2

129

41%

LEVEL 3

56

18%

LEVEL 4

21

7%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

44%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

3

33%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

214
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 654

LEVEL 1

156

24%

LEVEL 2

284

43%

LEVEL 3

147

22%

LEVEL 4

67

10%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

187
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 575

LEVEL 1

150

26%

LEVEL 2

238

41%

LEVEL 3

130

23%

LEVEL 4

57

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

4

44%

LEVEL 2

5

56%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

4

57%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

6

38%

LEVEL 2

8

50%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

4

33%

LEVEL 2

6

50%

LEVEL 3

2

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

217
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 594

LEVEL 1

101

17%

LEVEL 2

276

46%

LEVEL 3

147

25%

LEVEL 4

70

12%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

191
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 530

LEVEL 1

111

21%

LEVEL 2

228

43%

LEVEL 3

132

25%

LEVEL 4

59

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

65

69%

LEVEL 2

25

27%

LEVEL 3

4

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

48

65%

LEVEL 2

23

31%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

179
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 478

LEVEL 1

98

21%

LEVEL 2

201

42%

LEVEL 3

118

25%

LEVEL 4

61

13%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

155
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 408

LEVEL 1

79

19%

LEVEL 2

174

43%

LEVEL 3

106

26%

LEVEL 4

49

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

42
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

68

32%

LEVEL 2

100

48%

LEVEL 3

33

16%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

39
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

80

41%

LEVEL 2

77

39%

LEVEL 3

29

15%

LEVEL 4

10

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.