Skip to Content
Main content

CHESTNUT RIDGE MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

63
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 456

LEVEL 1

200

44%

LEVEL 2

193

42%

LEVEL 3

49

11%

LEVEL 4

14

3%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

58
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 469

LEVEL 1

269

57%

LEVEL 2

142

30%

LEVEL 3

53

11%

LEVEL 4

5

1%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

35
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 224

LEVEL 1

91

41%

LEVEL 2

98

44%

LEVEL 3

25

11%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

32
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 204

LEVEL 1

114

56%

LEVEL 2

58

28%

LEVEL 3

27

13%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

28
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

109

47%

LEVEL 2

95

41%

LEVEL 3

24

10%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

26
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 265

LEVEL 1

155

58%

LEVEL 2

84

32%

LEVEL 3

26

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

9
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

6

25%

LEVEL 2

9

38%

LEVEL 3

6

25%

LEVEL 4

3

13%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

9

43%

LEVEL 2

7

33%

LEVEL 3

4

19%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

32
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

99

42%

LEVEL 2

103

44%

LEVEL 3

25

11%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

30
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

112

52%

LEVEL 2

74

34%

LEVEL 3

27

13%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

15
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

90

51%

LEVEL 2

73

41%

LEVEL 3

13

7%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

19
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

146

67%

LEVEL 2

54

25%

LEVEL 3

18

8%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

62
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 363

LEVEL 1

130

36%

LEVEL 2

171

47%

LEVEL 3

48

13%

LEVEL 4

14

4%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

57
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 358

LEVEL 1

173

48%

LEVEL 2

128

36%

LEVEL 3

52

15%

LEVEL 4

5

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

70

75%

LEVEL 2

22

24%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

96

86%

LEVEL 2

14

13%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

63
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 383

LEVEL 1

136

36%

LEVEL 2

184

48%

LEVEL 3

49

13%

LEVEL 4

14

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

56
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 382

LEVEL 1

190

50%

LEVEL 2

136

36%

LEVEL 3

51

13%

LEVEL 4

5

1%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

64

88%

LEVEL 2

9

12%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

79

91%

LEVEL 2

6

7%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

22
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

21

30%

LEVEL 2

28

39%

LEVEL 3

16

23%

LEVEL 4

6

8%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

17
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

20

33%

LEVEL 2

23

38%

LEVEL 3

16

27%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

41
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 385

LEVEL 1

179

46%

LEVEL 2

165

43%

LEVEL 3

33

9%

LEVEL 4

8

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

41
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 409

LEVEL 1

249

61%

LEVEL 2

119

29%

LEVEL 3

37

9%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.