Skip to Content
Main content

SOUTH ORANGETOWN MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

332
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 779

LEVEL 1

117

15%

LEVEL 2

330

42%

LEVEL 3

235

30%

LEVEL 4

97

12%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

196
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 433

LEVEL 1

83

19%

LEVEL 2

154

36%

LEVEL 3

126

29%

LEVEL 4

70

16%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

192
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 390

LEVEL 1

40

10%

LEVEL 2

158

41%

LEVEL 3

133

34%

LEVEL 4

59

15%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

119
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

20

9%

LEVEL 2

80

37%

LEVEL 3

74

34%

LEVEL 4

45

21%

MALE

PROFICIENT

140
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 389

LEVEL 1

77

20%

LEVEL 2

172

44%

LEVEL 3

102

26%

LEVEL 4

38

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

77
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

63

29%

LEVEL 2

74

35%

LEVEL 3

52

24%

LEVEL 4

25

12%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

37
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

10

14%

LEVEL 2

22

32%

LEVEL 3

22

32%

LEVEL 4

15

22%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

38
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

8

13%

LEVEL 2

14

23%

LEVEL 3

24

40%

LEVEL 4

14

23%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

274
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 611

LEVEL 1

76

12%

LEVEL 2

261

43%

LEVEL 3

195

32%

LEVEL 4

79

13%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

135
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 300

LEVEL 1

47

16%

LEVEL 2

118

39%

LEVEL 3

85

28%

LEVEL 4

50

17%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

7
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

4

27%

LEVEL 2

4

27%

LEVEL 3

5

33%

LEVEL 4

2

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

7
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

5

36%

LEVEL 2

2

14%

LEVEL 3

4

29%

LEVEL 4

3

21%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

14
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

25

32%

LEVEL 2

40

51%

LEVEL 3

13

16%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

13
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

22

41%

LEVEL 2

19

35%

LEVEL 3

10

19%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

328
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 706

LEVEL 1

68

10%

LEVEL 2

310

44%

LEVEL 3

232

33%

LEVEL 4

96

14%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

193
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 389

LEVEL 1

49

13%

LEVEL 2

147

38%

LEVEL 3

124

32%

LEVEL 4

69

18%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

49

67%

LEVEL 2

20

27%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

34

77%

LEVEL 2

7

16%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

312
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 692

LEVEL 1

84

12%

LEVEL 2

296

43%

LEVEL 3

216

31%

LEVEL 4

96

14%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

177
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 383

LEVEL 1

58

15%

LEVEL 2

148

39%

LEVEL 3

111

29%

LEVEL 4

66

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

20
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

33

38%

LEVEL 2

34

39%

LEVEL 3

19

22%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

19
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

25

50%

LEVEL 2

6

12%

LEVEL 3

15

30%

LEVEL 4

4

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.