Skip to Content
Main content

HALDANE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

187
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 374

LEVEL 1

54

14%

LEVEL 2

133

36%

LEVEL 3

132

35%

LEVEL 4

55

15%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

153
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 318

LEVEL 1

45

14%

LEVEL 2

120

38%

LEVEL 3

115

36%

LEVEL 4

38

12%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

94
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

18

11%

LEVEL 2

58

34%

LEVEL 3

63

37%

LEVEL 4

31

18%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

73
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

20

14%

LEVEL 2

47

34%

LEVEL 3

57

41%

LEVEL 4

16

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

93
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 204

LEVEL 1

36

18%

LEVEL 2

75

37%

LEVEL 3

69

34%

LEVEL 4

24

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

80
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

25

14%

LEVEL 2

73

41%

LEVEL 3

58

33%

LEVEL 4

22

12%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

11
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

2

13%

LEVEL 2

3

19%

LEVEL 3

5

31%

LEVEL 4

6

38%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

7
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

1

9%

LEVEL 2

3

27%

LEVEL 3

4

36%

LEVEL 4

3

27%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

168
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 329

LEVEL 1

43

13%

LEVEL 2

118

36%

LEVEL 3

121

37%

LEVEL 4

47

14%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

138
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 281

LEVEL 1

35

12%

LEVEL 2

108

38%

LEVEL 3

107

38%

LEVEL 4

31

11%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

9

38%

LEVEL 2

11

46%

LEVEL 3

3

13%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

8

40%

LEVEL 2

7

35%

LEVEL 3

4

20%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

184
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 327

LEVEL 1

25

8%

LEVEL 2

118

36%

LEVEL 3

129

39%

LEVEL 4

55

17%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

150
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 276

LEVEL 1

19

7%

LEVEL 2

107

39%

LEVEL 3

112

41%

LEVEL 4

38

14%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

29

62%

LEVEL 2

15

32%

LEVEL 3

3

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

26

62%

LEVEL 2

13

31%

LEVEL 3

3

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

178
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 332

LEVEL 1

37

11%

LEVEL 2

117

35%

LEVEL 3

127

38%

LEVEL 4

51

15%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

147
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 281

LEVEL 1

31

11%

LEVEL 2

103

37%

LEVEL 3

110

39%

LEVEL 4

37

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

9
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

17

40%

LEVEL 2

16

38%

LEVEL 3

5

12%

LEVEL 4

4

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

6
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

14

38%

LEVEL 2

17

46%

LEVEL 3

5

14%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.