Skip to Content
Main content

NORTHSIDE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

268
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 656

LEVEL 1

140

21%

LEVEL 2

248

38%

LEVEL 3

195

30%

LEVEL 4

73

11%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

82
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

48

22%

LEVEL 2

84

39%

LEVEL 3

64

30%

LEVEL 4

18

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

144
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 317

LEVEL 1

54

17%

LEVEL 2

119

38%

LEVEL 3

101

32%

LEVEL 4

43

14%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

43
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

20

21%

LEVEL 2

33

34%

LEVEL 3

33

34%

LEVEL 4

10

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

124
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 339

LEVEL 1

86

25%

LEVEL 2

129

38%

LEVEL 3

94

28%

LEVEL 4

30

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

39
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

28

24%

LEVEL 2

51

43%

LEVEL 3

31

26%

LEVEL 4

8

7%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

4

57%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

10
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

3

16%

LEVEL 2

6

32%

LEVEL 3

7

37%

LEVEL 4

3

16%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

250
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 569

LEVEL 1

101

18%

LEVEL 2

218

38%

LEVEL 3

180

32%

LEVEL 4

70

12%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

73
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

34

20%

LEVEL 2

64

37%

LEVEL 3

58

34%

LEVEL 4

15

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

16

50%

LEVEL 2

15

47%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

7

39%

LEVEL 2

10

56%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

16

55%

LEVEL 2

6

21%

LEVEL 3

7

24%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

4

31%

LEVEL 2

7

54%

LEVEL 3

2

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

262
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 581

LEVEL 1

86

15%

LEVEL 2

233

40%

LEVEL 3

189

33%

LEVEL 4

73

13%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

82
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

30

16%

LEVEL 2

77

41%

LEVEL 3

64

34%

LEVEL 4

18

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

54

72%

LEVEL 2

15

20%

LEVEL 3

6

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

18

72%

LEVEL 2

7

28%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

244
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 514

LEVEL 1

79

15%

LEVEL 2

191

37%

LEVEL 3

174

34%

LEVEL 4

70

14%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

71
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

29

18%

LEVEL 2

59

37%

LEVEL 3

55

35%

LEVEL 4

16

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

24
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

61

43%

LEVEL 2

57

40%

LEVEL 3

21

15%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

11
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

19

35%

LEVEL 2

25

45%

LEVEL 3

9

16%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.