Skip to Content
Main content

CANANDAIGUA PRIMARY-ELEMENTARY GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

258
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 754

LEVEL 1

223

30%

LEVEL 2

273

36%

LEVEL 3

191

25%

LEVEL 4

67

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

241
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 630

LEVEL 1

173

27%

LEVEL 2

216

34%

LEVEL 3

174

28%

LEVEL 4

67

11%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

138
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 352

LEVEL 1

83

24%

LEVEL 2

131

37%

LEVEL 3

104

30%

LEVEL 4

34

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

135
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 296

LEVEL 1

63

21%

LEVEL 2

98

33%

LEVEL 3

96

32%

LEVEL 4

39

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

120
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 402

LEVEL 1

140

35%

LEVEL 2

142

35%

LEVEL 3

87

22%

LEVEL 4

33

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

106
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 334

LEVEL 1

110

33%

LEVEL 2

118

35%

LEVEL 3

78

23%

LEVEL 4

28

8%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

17

50%

LEVEL 2

10

29%

LEVEL 3

7

21%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

12

39%

LEVEL 2

12

39%

LEVEL 3

6

19%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

233
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 663

LEVEL 1

186

28%

LEVEL 2

244

37%

LEVEL 3

168

25%

LEVEL 4

65

10%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

216
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 541

LEVEL 1

138

26%

LEVEL 2

187

35%

LEVEL 3

151

28%

LEVEL 4

65

12%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

4

31%

LEVEL 2

9

69%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

3

21%

LEVEL 2

6

43%

LEVEL 3

5

36%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

13
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

12

38%

LEVEL 2

7

22%

LEVEL 3

11

34%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

14

48%

LEVEL 2

8

28%

LEVEL 3

6

21%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

253
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 651

LEVEL 1

143

22%

LEVEL 2

255

39%

LEVEL 3

186

29%

LEVEL 4

67

10%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

236
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 544

LEVEL 1

106

19%

LEVEL 2

202

37%

LEVEL 3

169

31%

LEVEL 4

67

12%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 103

LEVEL 1

80

78%

LEVEL 2

18

17%

LEVEL 3

5

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

67

78%

LEVEL 2

14

16%

LEVEL 3

5

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

215
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 523

LEVEL 1

108

21%

LEVEL 2

200

38%

LEVEL 3

154

29%

LEVEL 4

61

12%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

196
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 412

LEVEL 1

69

17%

LEVEL 2

147

36%

LEVEL 3

137

33%

LEVEL 4

59

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

43
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

115

50%

LEVEL 2

73

32%

LEVEL 3

37

16%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

45
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

104

48%

LEVEL 2

69

32%

LEVEL 3

37

17%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.