ONONDAGA CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

108
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 379

LEVEL 1

109

29%

LEVEL 2

162

43%

LEVEL 3

94

25%

LEVEL 4

14

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

73
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 264

LEVEL 1

84

32%

LEVEL 2

107

41%

LEVEL 3

55

21%

LEVEL 4

18

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

71
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

47

22%

LEVEL 2

91

44%

LEVEL 3

61

29%

LEVEL 4

10

5%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

47
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 134

LEVEL 1

31

23%

LEVEL 2

56

42%

LEVEL 3

34

25%

LEVEL 4

13

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

37
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

62

36%

LEVEL 2

71

42%

LEVEL 3

33

19%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

26
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

53

41%

LEVEL 2

51

39%

LEVEL 3

21

16%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

4

44%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

3
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

8

47%

LEVEL 2

6

35%

LEVEL 3

3

18%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

95
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 295

LEVEL 1

73

25%

LEVEL 2

127

43%

LEVEL 3

82

28%

LEVEL 4

13

4%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

64
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

55

27%

LEVEL 2

83

41%

LEVEL 3

46

23%

LEVEL 4

18

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

20

54%

LEVEL 2

12

32%

LEVEL 3

5

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

18

55%

LEVEL 2

12

36%

LEVEL 3

3

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

3

23%

LEVEL 2

9

69%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

6

67%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

106
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 332

LEVEL 1

73

22%

LEVEL 2

153

46%

LEVEL 3

93

28%

LEVEL 4

13

4%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

72
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

57

25%

LEVEL 2

96

43%

LEVEL 3

55

24%

LEVEL 4

17

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

36

77%

LEVEL 2

9

19%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

27

69%

LEVEL 2

11

28%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

80
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

43

19%

LEVEL 2

100

45%

LEVEL 3

68

30%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

50
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

31

22%

LEVEL 2

63

44%

LEVEL 3

36

25%

LEVEL 4

14

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

28
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

66

42%

LEVEL 2

62

40%

LEVEL 3

26

17%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

23
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 120

LEVEL 1

53

44%

LEVEL 2

44

37%

LEVEL 3

19

16%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.