Skip to Content
Main content

EAGLE HILL MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

396
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 650

LEVEL 1

55

8%

LEVEL 2

199

31%

LEVEL 3

211

32%

LEVEL 4

185

28%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

338
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 527

LEVEL 1

48

9%

LEVEL 2

141

27%

LEVEL 3

179

34%

LEVEL 4

159

30%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

207
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 326

LEVEL 1

19

6%

LEVEL 2

100

31%

LEVEL 3

108

33%

LEVEL 4

99

30%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

197
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

22

8%

LEVEL 2

51

19%

LEVEL 3

99

37%

LEVEL 4

98

36%

MALE

PROFICIENT

189
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 324

LEVEL 1

36

11%

LEVEL 2

99

31%

LEVEL 3

103

32%

LEVEL 4

86

27%

MALE

PROFICIENT

141
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 257

LEVEL 1

26

10%

LEVEL 2

90

35%

LEVEL 3

80

31%

LEVEL 4

61

24%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

2

33%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

56
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

5

7%

LEVEL 2

11

15%

LEVEL 3

22

31%

LEVEL 4

34

47%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

51
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

2

3%

LEVEL 2

13

20%

LEVEL 3

19

29%

LEVEL 4

32

48%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

329
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 546

LEVEL 1

45

8%

LEVEL 2

172

32%

LEVEL 3

181

33%

LEVEL 4

148

27%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

272
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 428

LEVEL 1

42

10%

LEVEL 2

114

27%

LEVEL 3

151

35%

LEVEL 4

121

28%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

3

20%

LEVEL 2

9

60%

LEVEL 3

3

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

7
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

1

8%

LEVEL 2

5

38%

LEVEL 3

5

38%

LEVEL 4

2

15%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

2

25%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

2

14%

LEVEL 2

6

43%

LEVEL 3

4

29%

LEVEL 4

2

14%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

389
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 595

LEVEL 1

23

4%

LEVEL 2

183

31%

LEVEL 3

204

34%

LEVEL 4

185

31%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

333
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 485

LEVEL 1

27

6%

LEVEL 2

125

26%

LEVEL 3

175

36%

LEVEL 4

158

33%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

32

58%

LEVEL 2

16

29%

LEVEL 3

7

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

21

50%

LEVEL 2

16

38%

LEVEL 3

4

10%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

389
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 611

LEVEL 1

46

8%

LEVEL 2

176

29%

LEVEL 3

204

33%

LEVEL 4

185

30%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

325
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 493

LEVEL 1

41

8%

LEVEL 2

127

26%

LEVEL 3

168

34%

LEVEL 4

157

32%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

7
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

9

23%

LEVEL 2

23

59%

LEVEL 3

7

18%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

13
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

7

21%

LEVEL 2

14

41%

LEVEL 3

11

32%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.