Skip to Content
Main content

ROYALTON-HARTLAND CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

140
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 586

LEVEL 1

250

43%

LEVEL 2

196

33%

LEVEL 3

100

17%

LEVEL 4

40

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

106
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 364

LEVEL 1

123

34%

LEVEL 2

135

37%

LEVEL 3

83

23%

LEVEL 4

23

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

92
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 297

LEVEL 1

92

31%

LEVEL 2

113

38%

LEVEL 3

64

22%

LEVEL 4

28

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

73
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

38

20%

LEVEL 2

75

40%

LEVEL 3

57

31%

LEVEL 4

16

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

48
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 289

LEVEL 1

158

55%

LEVEL 2

83

29%

LEVEL 3

36

12%

LEVEL 4

12

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

33
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

85

48%

LEVEL 2

60

34%

LEVEL 3

26

15%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

8

53%

LEVEL 2

6

40%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

5
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

3

30%

LEVEL 2

2

20%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

3

30%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

128
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 539

LEVEL 1

226

42%

LEVEL 2

185

34%

LEVEL 3

94

17%

LEVEL 4

34

6%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

100
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 334

LEVEL 1

107

32%

LEVEL 2

127

38%

LEVEL 3

78

23%

LEVEL 4

22

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

8

53%

LEVEL 2

2

13%

LEVEL 3

3

20%

LEVEL 4

2

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

7

44%

LEVEL 2

5

31%

LEVEL 3

4

25%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

139
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 525

LEVEL 1

196

37%

LEVEL 2

190

36%

LEVEL 3

99

19%

LEVEL 4

40

8%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

106
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 321

LEVEL 1

85

26%

LEVEL 2

130

40%

LEVEL 3

83

26%

LEVEL 4

23

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

54

89%

LEVEL 2

6

10%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

38

88%

LEVEL 2

5

12%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

111
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 377

LEVEL 1

133

35%

LEVEL 2

133

35%

LEVEL 3

78

21%

LEVEL 4

33

9%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

87
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

61

26%

LEVEL 2

84

36%

LEVEL 3

69

30%

LEVEL 4

18

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

29
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

117

56%

LEVEL 2

63

30%

LEVEL 3

22

11%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

19
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

62

47%

LEVEL 2

51

39%

LEVEL 3

14

11%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.