Skip to Content
Main content

STARPOINT CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

519
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,106

LEVEL 1

195

18%

LEVEL 2

392

35%

LEVEL 3

352

32%

LEVEL 4

167

15%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

375
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 786

LEVEL 1

143

18%

LEVEL 2

268

34%

LEVEL 3

249

32%

LEVEL 4

126

16%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

299
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 545

LEVEL 1

62

11%

LEVEL 2

184

34%

LEVEL 3

183

34%

LEVEL 4

116

21%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

221
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 389

LEVEL 1

49

13%

LEVEL 2

119

31%

LEVEL 3

137

35%

LEVEL 4

84

22%

MALE

PROFICIENT

220
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 561

LEVEL 1

133

24%

LEVEL 2

208

37%

LEVEL 3

169

30%

LEVEL 4

51

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

154
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 397

LEVEL 1

94

24%

LEVEL 2

149

38%

LEVEL 3

112

28%

LEVEL 4

42

11%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

3

30%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

3

30%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

10
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

3

18%

LEVEL 2

4

24%

LEVEL 3

6

35%

LEVEL 4

4

24%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

11
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

1

7%

LEVEL 2

3

20%

LEVEL 3

6

40%

LEVEL 4

5

33%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

493
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,052

LEVEL 1

184

17%

LEVEL 2

375

36%

LEVEL 3

335

32%

LEVEL 4

158

15%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

360
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 756

LEVEL 1

137

18%

LEVEL 2

259

34%

LEVEL 3

240

32%

LEVEL 4

120

16%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

4

25%

LEVEL 2

7

44%

LEVEL 3

5

31%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

4

44%

LEVEL 3

3

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

511
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 987

LEVEL 1

116

12%

LEVEL 2

360

36%

LEVEL 3

345

35%

LEVEL 4

166

17%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

366
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 690

LEVEL 1

81

12%

LEVEL 2

243

35%

LEVEL 3

240

35%

LEVEL 4

126

18%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 119

LEVEL 1

79

66%

LEVEL 2

32

27%

LEVEL 3

7

6%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

62

65%

LEVEL 2

25

26%

LEVEL 3

9

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

452
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 886

LEVEL 1

125

14%

LEVEL 2

309

35%

LEVEL 3

302

34%

LEVEL 4

150

17%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

328
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 636

LEVEL 1

93

15%

LEVEL 2

215

34%

LEVEL 3

213

33%

LEVEL 4

115

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

67
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

70

32%

LEVEL 2

83

38%

LEVEL 3

50

23%

LEVEL 4

17

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

47
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

50

33%

LEVEL 2

53

35%

LEVEL 3

36

24%

LEVEL 4

11

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.