Skip to Content
Main content

PS 42 ELTINGVILLE GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

181
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 437

LEVEL 1

75

17%

LEVEL 2

181

41%

LEVEL 3

143

33%

LEVEL 4

38

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

186
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 414

LEVEL 1

82

20%

LEVEL 2

146

35%

LEVEL 3

125

30%

LEVEL 4

61

15%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

94
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

26

12%

LEVEL 2

99

45%

LEVEL 3

75

34%

LEVEL 4

19

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

100
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

30

14%

LEVEL 2

77

37%

LEVEL 3

70

34%

LEVEL 4

30

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

87
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

49

22%

LEVEL 2

82

38%

LEVEL 3

68

31%

LEVEL 4

19

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

86
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

52

25%

LEVEL 2

69

33%

LEVEL 3

55

27%

LEVEL 4

31

15%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

12
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

25%

LEVEL 3

7

44%

LEVEL 4

5

31%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

13
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

24%

LEVEL 3

12

71%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

150
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 363

LEVEL 1

60

17%

LEVEL 2

153

42%

LEVEL 3

118

33%

LEVEL 4

32

9%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

157
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 344

LEVEL 1

67

19%

LEVEL 2

120

35%

LEVEL 3

102

30%

LEVEL 4

55

16%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

13
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

14

29%

LEVEL 2

22

45%

LEVEL 3

12

24%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

13
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

13

30%

LEVEL 2

17

40%

LEVEL 3

11

26%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

172
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 338

LEVEL 1

25

7%

LEVEL 2

141

42%

LEVEL 3

136

40%

LEVEL 4

36

11%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

175
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 325

LEVEL 1

33

10%

LEVEL 2

117

36%

LEVEL 3

118

36%

LEVEL 4

57

18%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 99

LEVEL 1

50

51%

LEVEL 2

40

40%

LEVEL 3

7

7%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

49

55%

LEVEL 2

29

33%

LEVEL 3

7

8%

LEVEL 4

4

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

180
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 429

LEVEL 1

68

16%

LEVEL 2

181

42%

LEVEL 3

142

33%

LEVEL 4

38

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

185
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 405

LEVEL 1

76

19%

LEVEL 2

144

36%

LEVEL 3

125

31%

LEVEL 4

60

15%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

7

88%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

6

67%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

126
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 266

LEVEL 1

38

14%

LEVEL 2

102

38%

LEVEL 3

96

36%

LEVEL 4

30

11%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

130
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

47

18%

LEVEL 2

82

32%

LEVEL 3

77

30%

LEVEL 4

53

20%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

55
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

37

22%

LEVEL 2

79

46%

LEVEL 3

47

27%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

56
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

35

23%

LEVEL 2

64

41%

LEVEL 3

48

31%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.