Skip to Content
Main content

PS 195 WILLIAM HABERLE GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

79
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 297

LEVEL 1

109

37%

LEVEL 2

109

37%

LEVEL 3

57

19%

LEVEL 4

22

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

65
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 302

LEVEL 1

128

42%

LEVEL 2

109

36%

LEVEL 3

50

17%

LEVEL 4

15

5%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

46
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

43

29%

LEVEL 2

61

41%

LEVEL 3

34

23%

LEVEL 4

12

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

37
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

54

35%

LEVEL 2

62

41%

LEVEL 3

28

18%

LEVEL 4

9

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

33
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

66

45%

LEVEL 2

48

33%

LEVEL 3

23

16%

LEVEL 4

10

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

28
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

74

50%

LEVEL 2

47

32%

LEVEL 3

22

15%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

76
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 280

LEVEL 1

105

38%

LEVEL 2

99

35%

LEVEL 3

54

19%

LEVEL 4

22

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

62
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 286

LEVEL 1

121

42%

LEVEL 2

103

36%

LEVEL 3

48

17%

LEVEL 4

14

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

2

20%

LEVEL 2

7

70%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

6

60%

LEVEL 2

2

20%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

79
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

59

26%

LEVEL 2

93

40%

LEVEL 3

57

25%

LEVEL 4

22

10%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

64
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

76

32%

LEVEL 2

97

41%

LEVEL 3

49

21%

LEVEL 4

15

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

50

76%

LEVEL 2

16

24%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

52

80%

LEVEL 2

12

18%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

79
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 291

LEVEL 1

108

37%

LEVEL 2

104

36%

LEVEL 3

57

20%

LEVEL 4

22

8%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

64
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 297

LEVEL 1

124

42%

LEVEL 2

109

37%

LEVEL 3

49

16%

LEVEL 4

15

5%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

5

83%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

4

80%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

16
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

10

26%

LEVEL 2

13

33%

LEVEL 3

12

31%

LEVEL 4

4

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

7
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

5

19%

LEVEL 2

15

56%

LEVEL 3

6

22%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

63
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 258

LEVEL 1

99

38%

LEVEL 2

96

37%

LEVEL 3

45

17%

LEVEL 4

18

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

58
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 275

LEVEL 1

123

45%

LEVEL 2

94

34%

LEVEL 3

44

16%

LEVEL 4

14

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.