Skip to Content
Main content

PS 121 GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

149
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 405

LEVEL 1

87

21%

LEVEL 2

169

42%

LEVEL 3

110

27%

LEVEL 4

39

10%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

156
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 384

LEVEL 1

76

20%

LEVEL 2

152

40%

LEVEL 3

115

30%

LEVEL 4

41

11%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

79
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

27

14%

LEVEL 2

91

46%

LEVEL 3

62

31%

LEVEL 4

17

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

88
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

25

13%

LEVEL 2

73

39%

LEVEL 3

62

33%

LEVEL 4

26

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

70
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

60

29%

LEVEL 2

78

38%

LEVEL 3

48

23%

LEVEL 4

22

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

68
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 198

LEVEL 1

51

26%

LEVEL 2

79

40%

LEVEL 3

53

27%

LEVEL 4

15

8%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

75
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 195

LEVEL 1

35

18%

LEVEL 2

85

44%

LEVEL 3

54

28%

LEVEL 4

21

11%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

68
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

27

18%

LEVEL 2

52

35%

LEVEL 3

45

31%

LEVEL 4

23

16%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

37
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 88

LEVEL 1

20

23%

LEVEL 2

31

35%

LEVEL 3

25

28%

LEVEL 4

12

14%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

58
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

18

14%

LEVEL 2

54

42%

LEVEL 3

50

38%

LEVEL 4

8

6%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

23
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 82

LEVEL 1

20

24%

LEVEL 2

39

48%

LEVEL 3

21

26%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

18
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

19

27%

LEVEL 2

34

48%

LEVEL 3

15

21%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

143
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 361

LEVEL 1

59

16%

LEVEL 2

159

44%

LEVEL 3

106

29%

LEVEL 4

37

10%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

151
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 336

LEVEL 1

45

13%

LEVEL 2

140

42%

LEVEL 3

110

33%

LEVEL 4

41

12%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

28

64%

LEVEL 2

10

23%

LEVEL 3

4

9%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

31

65%

LEVEL 2

12

25%

LEVEL 3

5

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

149
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 396

LEVEL 1

82

21%

LEVEL 2

165

42%

LEVEL 3

110

28%

LEVEL 4

39

10%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

156
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 379

LEVEL 1

72

19%

LEVEL 2

151

40%

LEVEL 3

115

30%

LEVEL 4

41

11%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

5

56%

LEVEL 2

4

44%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

4

80%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

27
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

6

13%

LEVEL 2

15

31%

LEVEL 3

16

33%

LEVEL 4

11

23%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

31
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

12

19%

LEVEL 2

21

33%

LEVEL 3

21

33%

LEVEL 4

10

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

122
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 357

LEVEL 1

81

23%

LEVEL 2

154

43%

LEVEL 3

94

26%

LEVEL 4

28

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

125
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 320

LEVEL 1

64

20%

LEVEL 2

131

41%

LEVEL 3

94

29%

LEVEL 4

31

10%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.