Skip to Content
Main content

PS 131 GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

114
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 435

LEVEL 1

164

38%

LEVEL 2

157

36%

LEVEL 3

82

19%

LEVEL 4

32

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

162
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 476

LEVEL 1

130

27%

LEVEL 2

184

39%

LEVEL 3

124

26%

LEVEL 4

38

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

56
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

67

33%

LEVEL 2

78

39%

LEVEL 3

37

18%

LEVEL 4

19

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

77
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

61

27%

LEVEL 2

87

39%

LEVEL 3

60

27%

LEVEL 4

17

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

58
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

97

41%

LEVEL 2

79

34%

LEVEL 3

45

19%

LEVEL 4

13

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

85
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

69

27%

LEVEL 2

97

39%

LEVEL 3

64

25%

LEVEL 4

21

8%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

61
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

39

26%

LEVEL 2

49

33%

LEVEL 3

40

27%

LEVEL 4

21

14%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

80
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 162

LEVEL 1

34

21%

LEVEL 2

48

30%

LEVEL 3

55

34%

LEVEL 4

25

15%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

9
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

11

37%

LEVEL 2

10

33%

LEVEL 3

8

27%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

16
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

13

31%

LEVEL 2

13

31%

LEVEL 3

14

33%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

1

13%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

2

25%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

40
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 248

LEVEL 1

113

46%

LEVEL 2

95

38%

LEVEL 3

32

13%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

63
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 264

LEVEL 1

81

31%

LEVEL 2

120

45%

LEVEL 3

53

20%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

111
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 368

LEVEL 1

112

30%

LEVEL 2

145

39%

LEVEL 3

80

22%

LEVEL 4

31

8%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

157
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 413

LEVEL 1

85

21%

LEVEL 2

171

41%

LEVEL 3

119

29%

LEVEL 4

38

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

52

78%

LEVEL 2

12

18%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

45

71%

LEVEL 2

13

21%

LEVEL 3

5

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

102
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 302

LEVEL 1

78

26%

LEVEL 2

122

40%

LEVEL 3

70

23%

LEVEL 4

32

11%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

140
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 336

LEVEL 1

48

14%

LEVEL 2

148

44%

LEVEL 3

106

32%

LEVEL 4

34

10%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

12
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

86

65%

LEVEL 2

35

26%

LEVEL 3

12

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

22
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

82

59%

LEVEL 2

36

26%

LEVEL 3

18

13%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

54
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

29

21%

LEVEL 2

57

41%

LEVEL 3

42

30%

LEVEL 4

12

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

108
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 336

LEVEL 1

101

30%

LEVEL 2

127

38%

LEVEL 3

82

24%

LEVEL 4

26

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.