PS 295 GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

69
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

47

28%

LEVEL 2

54

32%

LEVEL 3

43

25%

LEVEL 4

26

15%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

84
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 195

LEVEL 1

42

22%

LEVEL 2

69

35%

LEVEL 3

50

26%

LEVEL 4

34

17%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

43
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

20

23%

LEVEL 2

24

28%

LEVEL 3

29

33%

LEVEL 4

14

16%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

43
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

15

17%

LEVEL 2

31

35%

LEVEL 3

20

22%

LEVEL 4

23

26%

MALE

PROFICIENT

26
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

27

33%

LEVEL 2

30

36%

LEVEL 3

14

17%

LEVEL 4

12

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

41
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

27

25%

LEVEL 2

38

36%

LEVEL 3

30

28%

LEVEL 4

11

10%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

4

67%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

2

29%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

3

21%

LEVEL 2

7

50%

LEVEL 3

3

21%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

36
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

9

16%

LEVEL 2

11

20%

LEVEL 3

18

32%

LEVEL 4

18

32%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

41
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

6

10%

LEVEL 2

13

22%

LEVEL 3

23

38%

LEVEL 4

18

30%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

8
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

2

11%

LEVEL 2

8

44%

LEVEL 3

4

22%

LEVEL 4

4

22%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

9
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

2

9%

LEVEL 2

11

50%

LEVEL 3

5

23%

LEVEL 4

4

18%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

18
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

34

41%

LEVEL 2

31

37%

LEVEL 3

15

18%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

25
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

31

33%

LEVEL 2

37

40%

LEVEL 3

17

18%

LEVEL 4

8

9%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

64
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 125

LEVEL 1

22

18%

LEVEL 2

39

31%

LEVEL 3

41

33%

LEVEL 4

23

18%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

76
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

17

12%

LEVEL 2

52

36%

LEVEL 3

43

30%

LEVEL 4

33

23%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

25

56%

LEVEL 2

15

33%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

3

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

25

50%

LEVEL 2

17

34%

LEVEL 3

7

14%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

66
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

26

19%

LEVEL 2

48

34%

LEVEL 3

40

29%

LEVEL 4

26

19%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

81
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

26

15%

LEVEL 2

61

36%

LEVEL 3

47

28%

LEVEL 4

34

20%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

3
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

21

70%

LEVEL 2

6

20%

LEVEL 3

3

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

3
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

16

59%

LEVEL 2

8

30%

LEVEL 3

3

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

63
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 112

LEVEL 1

12

11%

LEVEL 2

37

33%

LEVEL 3

34

30%

LEVEL 4

29

26%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

21
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

30

36%

LEVEL 2

32

39%

LEVEL 3

16

19%

LEVEL 4

5

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.