Skip to Content
Main content

PS 111 SETON FALLS GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

39
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 301

LEVEL 1

172

57%

LEVEL 2

90

30%

LEVEL 3

34

11%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

35
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 328

LEVEL 1

204

62%

LEVEL 2

89

27%

LEVEL 3

31

9%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

22
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

74

52%

LEVEL 2

46

32%

LEVEL 3

20

14%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

21
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

87

56%

LEVEL 2

48

31%

LEVEL 3

20

13%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

17
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

98

62%

LEVEL 2

44

28%

LEVEL 3

14

9%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

14
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

117

68%

LEVEL 2

41

24%

LEVEL 3

11

6%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

5

83%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

27
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

111

53%

LEVEL 2

72

34%

LEVEL 3

24

11%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

22
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

124

60%

LEVEL 2

61

29%

LEVEL 3

20

10%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

11
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

72

65%

LEVEL 2

27

25%

LEVEL 3

10

9%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

38
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

110

48%

LEVEL 2

79

35%

LEVEL 3

33

15%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

34
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

126

53%

LEVEL 2

79

33%

LEVEL 3

30

13%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

62

84%

LEVEL 2

11

15%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

78

88%

LEVEL 2

10

11%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

38
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

151

55%

LEVEL 2

88

32%

LEVEL 3

33

12%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

35
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 310

LEVEL 1

189

61%

LEVEL 2

86

28%

LEVEL 3

31

10%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

21

88%

LEVEL 2

2

8%

LEVEL 3

1

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

15

83%

LEVEL 2

3

17%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

1
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

8

40%

LEVEL 2

11

55%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

1
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

17

74%

LEVEL 2

5

22%

LEVEL 3

1

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

38
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 281

LEVEL 1

164

58%

LEVEL 2

79

28%

LEVEL 3

33

12%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

34
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 305

LEVEL 1

187

61%

LEVEL 2

84

28%

LEVEL 3

30

10%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.