Skip to Content
Main content

PS/MS 280 MOSHOLU PARKWAY GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

133
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 570

LEVEL 1

212

37%

LEVEL 2

225

39%

LEVEL 3

110

19%

LEVEL 4

23

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

147
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 584

LEVEL 1

208

36%

LEVEL 2

229

39%

LEVEL 3

125

21%

LEVEL 4

22

4%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

69
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

101

37%

LEVEL 2

101

37%

LEVEL 3

54

20%

LEVEL 4

15

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

79
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 284

LEVEL 1

91

32%

LEVEL 2

114

40%

LEVEL 3

69

24%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

64
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 299

LEVEL 1

111

37%

LEVEL 2

124

41%

LEVEL 3

56

19%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

68
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 300

LEVEL 1

117

39%

LEVEL 2

115

38%

LEVEL 3

56

19%

LEVEL 4

12

4%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

31
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

21

31%

LEVEL 2

16

24%

LEVEL 3

27

40%

LEVEL 4

4

6%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

23
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

17

25%

LEVEL 2

29

42%

LEVEL 3

15

22%

LEVEL 4

8

12%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

9
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

25

42%

LEVEL 2

26

43%

LEVEL 3

6

10%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

15
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

24

43%

LEVEL 2

17

30%

LEVEL 3

13

23%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

79
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 400

LEVEL 1

158

40%

LEVEL 2

163

41%

LEVEL 3

67

17%

LEVEL 4

12

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

97
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 427

LEVEL 1

159

37%

LEVEL 2

171

40%

LEVEL 3

86

20%

LEVEL 4

11

3%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

127
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 431

LEVEL 1

111

26%

LEVEL 2

193

45%

LEVEL 3

105

24%

LEVEL 4

22

5%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

137
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 424

LEVEL 1

97

23%

LEVEL 2

190

45%

LEVEL 3

116

27%

LEVEL 4

21

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

101

73%

LEVEL 2

32

23%

LEVEL 3

5

4%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 160

LEVEL 1

111

69%

LEVEL 2

39

24%

LEVEL 3

9

6%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

130
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 494

LEVEL 1

153

31%

LEVEL 2

211

43%

LEVEL 3

107

22%

LEVEL 4

23

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

145
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 511

LEVEL 1

150

29%

LEVEL 2

216

42%

LEVEL 3

123

24%

LEVEL 4

22

4%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

59

78%

LEVEL 2

14

18%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

58

79%

LEVEL 2

13

18%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

14
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

7

18%

LEVEL 2

18

46%

LEVEL 3

12

31%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

11
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

3

11%

LEVEL 2

14

50%

LEVEL 3

8

29%

LEVEL 4

3

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

119
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 531

LEVEL 1

205

39%

LEVEL 2

207

39%

LEVEL 3

98

18%

LEVEL 4

21

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

136
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 556

LEVEL 1

205

37%

LEVEL 2

215

39%

LEVEL 3

117

21%

LEVEL 4

19

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.