Skip to Content
Main content

RIVERDALE/KINGSBRIDGE (MS/HS 141) GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

236
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 659

LEVEL 1

142

22%

LEVEL 2

281

43%

LEVEL 3

159

24%

LEVEL 4

77

12%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

230
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 637

LEVEL 1

148

23%

LEVEL 2

259

41%

LEVEL 3

160

25%

LEVEL 4

70

11%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

137
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 326

LEVEL 1

48

15%

LEVEL 2

141

43%

LEVEL 3

86

26%

LEVEL 4

51

16%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

136
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 311

LEVEL 1

53

17%

LEVEL 2

122

39%

LEVEL 3

92

30%

LEVEL 4

44

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

99
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 333

LEVEL 1

94

28%

LEVEL 2

140

42%

LEVEL 3

73

22%

LEVEL 4

26

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

94
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 326

LEVEL 1

95

29%

LEVEL 2

137

42%

LEVEL 3

68

21%

LEVEL 4

26

8%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

99
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

21

11%

LEVEL 2

76

39%

LEVEL 3

57

29%

LEVEL 4

42

21%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

83
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

29

17%

LEVEL 2

62

36%

LEVEL 3

52

30%

LEVEL 4

31

18%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

19
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

18

28%

LEVEL 2

28

43%

LEVEL 3

13

20%

LEVEL 4

6

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

21
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

17

27%

LEVEL 2

26

41%

LEVEL 3

15

23%

LEVEL 4

6

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

84
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 341

LEVEL 1

98

29%

LEVEL 2

159

47%

LEVEL 3

68

20%

LEVEL 4

16

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

89
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 338

LEVEL 1

98

29%

LEVEL 2

151

45%

LEVEL 3

68

20%

LEVEL 4

21

6%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

222
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 522

LEVEL 1

67

13%

LEVEL 2

233

45%

LEVEL 3

148

28%

LEVEL 4

74

14%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

215
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 518

LEVEL 1

78

15%

LEVEL 2

225

43%

LEVEL 3

147

28%

LEVEL 4

68

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

14
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

75

55%

LEVEL 2

48

35%

LEVEL 3

11

8%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

15
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 119

LEVEL 1

70

59%

LEVEL 2

34

29%

LEVEL 3

13

11%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

236
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 622

LEVEL 1

116

19%

LEVEL 2

270

43%

LEVEL 3

159

26%

LEVEL 4

77

12%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

229
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 603

LEVEL 1

121

20%

LEVEL 2

253

42%

LEVEL 3

160

27%

LEVEL 4

69

11%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

26

70%

LEVEL 2

11

30%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

27

79%

LEVEL 2

6

18%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

150
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 300

LEVEL 1

46

15%

LEVEL 2

104

35%

LEVEL 3

98

33%

LEVEL 4

52

17%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

141
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 292

LEVEL 1

51

17%

LEVEL 2

100

34%

LEVEL 3

96

33%

LEVEL 4

45

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

86
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 359

LEVEL 1

96

27%

LEVEL 2

177

49%

LEVEL 3

61

17%

LEVEL 4

25

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

89
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 345

LEVEL 1

97

28%

LEVEL 2

159

46%

LEVEL 3

64

19%

LEVEL 4

25

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.