Skip to Content
Main content

EXPLORE CHARTER SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

81
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 350

LEVEL 1

103

29%

LEVEL 2

166

47%

LEVEL 3

71

20%

LEVEL 4

10

3%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

57
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 342

LEVEL 1

129

38%

LEVEL 2

156

46%

LEVEL 3

45

13%

LEVEL 4

12

4%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

47
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

37

22%

LEVEL 2

86

51%

LEVEL 3

39

23%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

28
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 162

LEVEL 1

55

34%

LEVEL 2

79

49%

LEVEL 3

21

13%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

34
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

66

37%

LEVEL 2

80

44%

LEVEL 3

32

18%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

29
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

74

41%

LEVEL 2

77

43%

LEVEL 3

24

13%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

72
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 325

LEVEL 1

99

30%

LEVEL 2

154

47%

LEVEL 3

62

19%

LEVEL 4

10

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

49
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 300

LEVEL 1

113

38%

LEVEL 2

138

46%

LEVEL 3

38

13%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

13

45%

LEVEL 2

10

34%

LEVEL 3

5

17%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

80
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 293

LEVEL 1

63

22%

LEVEL 2

150

51%

LEVEL 3

70

24%

LEVEL 4

10

3%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

57
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 292

LEVEL 1

93

32%

LEVEL 2

142

49%

LEVEL 3

45

15%

LEVEL 4

12

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

40

70%

LEVEL 2

16

28%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

36

72%

LEVEL 2

14

28%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

23
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

21

25%

LEVEL 2

40

48%

LEVEL 3

21

25%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

20
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

31

32%

LEVEL 2

45

47%

LEVEL 3

14

15%

LEVEL 4

6

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

58
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 266

LEVEL 1

82

31%

LEVEL 2

126

47%

LEVEL 3

50

19%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

37
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 246

LEVEL 1

98

40%

LEVEL 2

111

45%

LEVEL 3

31

13%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.