BAYVILLE PRIMARY GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

110
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

17

9%

LEVEL 2

66

34%

LEVEL 3

86

45%

LEVEL 4

24

12%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

79
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

11

9%

LEVEL 2

36

29%

LEVEL 3

44

35%

LEVEL 4

35

28%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

64
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

8

8%

LEVEL 2

30

29%

LEVEL 3

45

44%

LEVEL 4

19

19%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

38
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

4

6%

LEVEL 2

20

32%

LEVEL 3

17

27%

LEVEL 4

21

34%

MALE

PROFICIENT

46
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

9

10%

LEVEL 2

36

40%

LEVEL 3

41

45%

LEVEL 4

5

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

41
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

7

11%

LEVEL 2

16

25%

LEVEL 3

27

42%

LEVEL 4

14

22%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

94
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

15

9%

LEVEL 2

49

31%

LEVEL 3

73

46%

LEVEL 4

21

13%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

68
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 99

LEVEL 1

7

7%

LEVEL 2

24

24%

LEVEL 3

36

36%

LEVEL 4

32

32%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

12
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

1

4%

LEVEL 2

12

48%

LEVEL 3

11

44%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

10
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

3

14%

LEVEL 2

8

38%

LEVEL 3

7

33%

LEVEL 4

3

14%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

104
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

10

6%

LEVEL 2

49

30%

LEVEL 3

80

49%

LEVEL 4

24

15%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

73
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 108

LEVEL 1

4

4%

LEVEL 2

31

29%

LEVEL 3

39

36%

LEVEL 4

34

31%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

7

23%

LEVEL 2

17

57%

LEVEL 3

6

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

7

39%

LEVEL 2

5

28%

LEVEL 3

5

28%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

108
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

15

8%

LEVEL 2

64

34%

LEVEL 3

84

45%

LEVEL 4

24

13%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

77
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 120

LEVEL 1

10

8%

LEVEL 2

33

28%

LEVEL 3

43

36%

LEVEL 4

34

28%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

103
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

11

7%

LEVEL 2

52

31%

LEVEL 3

79

48%

LEVEL 4

24

14%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

69
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 99

LEVEL 1

8

8%

LEVEL 2

22

22%

LEVEL 3

39

39%

LEVEL 4

30

30%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

7
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

6

22%

LEVEL 2

14

52%

LEVEL 3

7

26%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

10
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

3

11%

LEVEL 2

14

52%

LEVEL 3

5

19%

LEVEL 4

5

19%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.