Skip to Content
Main content

RUSHMORE AVENUE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

150
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 384

LEVEL 1

62

16%

LEVEL 2

172

45%

LEVEL 3

119

31%

LEVEL 4

31

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

90
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

39

18%

LEVEL 2

91

41%

LEVEL 3

63

29%

LEVEL 4

27

12%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

88
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

25

14%

LEVEL 2

72

39%

LEVEL 3

67

36%

LEVEL 4

21

11%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

48
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

14

13%

LEVEL 2

44

42%

LEVEL 3

33

31%

LEVEL 4

15

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

62
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

37

19%

LEVEL 2

100

50%

LEVEL 3

52

26%

LEVEL 4

10

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

42
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 114

LEVEL 1

25

22%

LEVEL 2

47

41%

LEVEL 3

30

26%

LEVEL 4

12

11%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

1

11%

LEVEL 2

6

67%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

16
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

5

14%

LEVEL 2

16

43%

LEVEL 3

8

22%

LEVEL 4

8

22%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

19
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

4

13%

LEVEL 2

9

28%

LEVEL 3

15

47%

LEVEL 4

4

13%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

117
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 272

LEVEL 1

41

15%

LEVEL 2

114

42%

LEVEL 3

99

36%

LEVEL 4

18

7%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

60
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

24

18%

LEVEL 2

53

39%

LEVEL 3

40

29%

LEVEL 4

20

15%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

13
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

12

20%

LEVEL 2

34

58%

LEVEL 3

8

14%

LEVEL 4

5

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

11
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

9

23%

LEVEL 2

20

50%

LEVEL 3

8

20%

LEVEL 4

3

8%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

145
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 324

LEVEL 1

29

9%

LEVEL 2

150

46%

LEVEL 3

115

35%

LEVEL 4

30

9%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

90
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

20

10%

LEVEL 2

86

44%

LEVEL 3

63

32%

LEVEL 4

27

14%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

33

55%

LEVEL 2

22

37%

LEVEL 3

4

7%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

19

79%

LEVEL 2

5

21%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

149
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 369

LEVEL 1

50

14%

LEVEL 2

170

46%

LEVEL 3

118

32%

LEVEL 4

31

8%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

12

80%

LEVEL 2

2

13%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

132
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 319

LEVEL 1

46

14%

LEVEL 2

141

44%

LEVEL 3

103

32%

LEVEL 4

29

9%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

73
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

31

18%

LEVEL 2

71

41%

LEVEL 3

50

29%

LEVEL 4

23

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

18
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

16

25%

LEVEL 2

31

48%

LEVEL 3

16

25%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

17
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

8

18%

LEVEL 2

20

44%

LEVEL 3

13

29%

LEVEL 4

4

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.