GRAND AVENUE MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

308
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 676

LEVEL 1

122

18%

LEVEL 2

246

36%

LEVEL 3

203

30%

LEVEL 4

105

16%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

142
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 298

LEVEL 1

59

20%

LEVEL 2

97

33%

LEVEL 3

94

32%

LEVEL 4

48

16%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

164
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 331

LEVEL 1

41

12%

LEVEL 2

126

38%

LEVEL 3

103

31%

LEVEL 4

61

18%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

77
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

23

15%

LEVEL 2

55

35%

LEVEL 3

45

29%

LEVEL 4

32

21%

MALE

PROFICIENT

144
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 345

LEVEL 1

81

23%

LEVEL 2

120

35%

LEVEL 3

100

29%

LEVEL 4

44

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

65
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

36

25%

LEVEL 2

42

29%

LEVEL 3

49

34%

LEVEL 4

16

11%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

26
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

4

8%

LEVEL 2

18

38%

LEVEL 3

15

31%

LEVEL 4

11

23%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

18
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

4

12%

LEVEL 2

12

35%

LEVEL 3

10

29%

LEVEL 4

8

24%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

265
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 575

LEVEL 1

105

18%

LEVEL 2

205

36%

LEVEL 3

174

30%

LEVEL 4

91

16%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

111
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

41

18%

LEVEL 2

77

34%

LEVEL 3

76

33%

LEVEL 4

35

15%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

2

11%

LEVEL 2

10

56%

LEVEL 3

6

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

9
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

11

37%

LEVEL 2

10

33%

LEVEL 3

7

23%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

11
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

11

37%

LEVEL 2

8

27%

LEVEL 3

7

23%

LEVEL 4

4

13%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

304
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 587

LEVEL 1

72

12%

LEVEL 2

211

36%

LEVEL 3

200

34%

LEVEL 4

104

18%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

137
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

40

15%

LEVEL 2

90

34%

LEVEL 3

89

33%

LEVEL 4

48

18%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

50

56%

LEVEL 2

35

39%

LEVEL 3

3

3%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

19

61%

LEVEL 2

7

23%

LEVEL 3

5

16%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

293
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 609

LEVEL 1

102

17%

LEVEL 2

214

35%

LEVEL 3

191

31%

LEVEL 4

102

17%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

134
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 266

LEVEL 1

52

20%

LEVEL 2

80

30%

LEVEL 3

88

33%

LEVEL 4

46

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

15
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

20

30%

LEVEL 2

32

48%

LEVEL 3

12

18%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

8
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

7

22%

LEVEL 2

17

53%

LEVEL 3

6

19%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.