Skip to Content
Main content

H FRANK CAREY HIGH SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

164
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 504

LEVEL 1

116

23%

LEVEL 2

224

44%

LEVEL 3

141

28%

LEVEL 4

23

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

139
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 328

LEVEL 1

64

20%

LEVEL 2

125

38%

LEVEL 3

109

33%

LEVEL 4

30

9%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

78
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 217

LEVEL 1

48

22%

LEVEL 2

91

42%

LEVEL 3

69

32%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

69
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

18

13%

LEVEL 2

51

37%

LEVEL 3

56

41%

LEVEL 4

13

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

86
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 287

LEVEL 1

68

24%

LEVEL 2

133

46%

LEVEL 3

72

25%

LEVEL 4

14

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

70
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

46

24%

LEVEL 2

74

39%

LEVEL 3

53

28%

LEVEL 4

17

9%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

17
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

6

15%

LEVEL 2

17

43%

LEVEL 3

15

38%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

26
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

4

10%

LEVEL 2

9

23%

LEVEL 3

19

49%

LEVEL 4

7

18%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

126
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 392

LEVEL 1

86

22%

LEVEL 2

180

46%

LEVEL 3

112

29%

LEVEL 4

14

4%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

95
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

40

17%

LEVEL 2

95

41%

LEVEL 3

74

32%

LEVEL 4

21

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

6

40%

LEVEL 2

7

47%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

19
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

18

32%

LEVEL 2

20

35%

LEVEL 3

13

23%

LEVEL 4

6

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

16
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

15

32%

LEVEL 2

16

34%

LEVEL 3

14

30%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

162
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 440

LEVEL 1

71

16%

LEVEL 2

207

47%

LEVEL 3

139

32%

LEVEL 4

23

5%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

137
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 291

LEVEL 1

40

14%

LEVEL 2

114

39%

LEVEL 3

107

37%

LEVEL 4

30

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

45

70%

LEVEL 2

17

27%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

24

65%

LEVEL 2

11

30%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

155
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 453

LEVEL 1

97

21%

LEVEL 2

201

44%

LEVEL 3

132

29%

LEVEL 4

23

5%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

129
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 297

LEVEL 1

51

17%

LEVEL 2

117

39%

LEVEL 3

101

34%

LEVEL 4

28

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

9
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

19

37%

LEVEL 2

23

45%

LEVEL 3

9

18%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

10
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

13

42%

LEVEL 2

8

26%

LEVEL 3

8

26%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.