ISLAND PARK UFSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

175
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 418

LEVEL 1

80

19%

LEVEL 2

163

39%

LEVEL 3

126

30%

LEVEL 4

49

12%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

98
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 303

LEVEL 1

76

25%

LEVEL 2

129

43%

LEVEL 3

82

27%

LEVEL 4

16

5%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

92
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

29

14%

LEVEL 2

84

41%

LEVEL 3

63

31%

LEVEL 4

29

14%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

57
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

25

17%

LEVEL 2

65

44%

LEVEL 3

49

33%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

83
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 213

LEVEL 1

51

24%

LEVEL 2

79

37%

LEVEL 3

63

30%

LEVEL 4

20

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

41
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

51

33%

LEVEL 2

64

41%

LEVEL 3

33

21%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

7
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

2

14%

LEVEL 2

5

36%

LEVEL 3

4

29%

LEVEL 4

3

21%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

6
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

2

15%

LEVEL 2

5

38%

LEVEL 3

5

38%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

122
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 260

LEVEL 1

44

17%

LEVEL 2

94

36%

LEVEL 3

83

32%

LEVEL 4

39

15%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

64
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

33

20%

LEVEL 2

68

41%

LEVEL 3

50

30%

LEVEL 4

14

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

43
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

28

21%

LEVEL 2

60

46%

LEVEL 3

36

27%

LEVEL 4

7

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

25
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

34

30%

LEVEL 2

54

48%

LEVEL 3

24

21%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

172
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 383

LEVEL 1

58

15%

LEVEL 2

153

40%

LEVEL 3

123

32%

LEVEL 4

49

13%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

96
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 275

LEVEL 1

56

20%

LEVEL 2

123

45%

LEVEL 3

81

29%

LEVEL 4

15

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

22

63%

LEVEL 2

10

29%

LEVEL 3

3

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

20

71%

LEVEL 2

6

21%

LEVEL 3

1

4%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

175
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 403

LEVEL 1

67

17%

LEVEL 2

161

40%

LEVEL 3

126

31%

LEVEL 4

49

12%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

98
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 286

LEVEL 1

60

21%

LEVEL 2

128

45%

LEVEL 3

82

29%

LEVEL 4

16

6%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

13

87%

LEVEL 2

2

13%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

16

94%

LEVEL 2

1

6%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

109
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

38

16%

LEVEL 2

86

37%

LEVEL 3

78

33%

LEVEL 4

31

13%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

62
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

24

16%

LEVEL 2

61

41%

LEVEL 3

49

33%

LEVEL 4

13

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

66
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

42

23%

LEVEL 2

77

42%

LEVEL 3

48

26%

LEVEL 4

18

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

36
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

52

33%

LEVEL 2

68

44%

LEVEL 3

33

21%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.