Skip to Content
Main content

FLORAL PARK-BELLEROSE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

243
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 482

LEVEL 1

68

14%

LEVEL 2

171

35%

LEVEL 3

150

31%

LEVEL 4

93

19%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

171
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 357

LEVEL 1

43

12%

LEVEL 2

143

40%

LEVEL 3

124

35%

LEVEL 4

47

13%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

124
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

19

8%

LEVEL 2

84

37%

LEVEL 3

72

32%

LEVEL 4

52

23%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

89
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

15

9%

LEVEL 2

66

39%

LEVEL 3

59

35%

LEVEL 4

30

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

119
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

49

19%

LEVEL 2

87

34%

LEVEL 3

78

31%

LEVEL 4

41

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

82
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

28

15%

LEVEL 2

77

41%

LEVEL 3

65

35%

LEVEL 4

17

9%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

40
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

9

14%

LEVEL 2

16

25%

LEVEL 3

23

35%

LEVEL 4

17

26%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

34
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

10

14%

LEVEL 2

29

40%

LEVEL 3

26

36%

LEVEL 4

8

11%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

176
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 339

LEVEL 1

37

11%

LEVEL 2

126

37%

LEVEL 3

109

32%

LEVEL 4

67

20%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

118
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

22

10%

LEVEL 2

82

37%

LEVEL 3

86

39%

LEVEL 4

32

14%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

23
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

16

25%

LEVEL 2

24

38%

LEVEL 3

17

27%

LEVEL 4

6

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

15
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

6

15%

LEVEL 2

19

48%

LEVEL 3

8

20%

LEVEL 4

7

18%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

240
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 446

LEVEL 1

47

11%

LEVEL 2

159

36%

LEVEL 3

149

33%

LEVEL 4

91

20%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

168
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 328

LEVEL 1

29

9%

LEVEL 2

131

40%

LEVEL 3

121

37%

LEVEL 4

47

14%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

21

58%

LEVEL 2

12

33%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

14

48%

LEVEL 2

12

41%

LEVEL 3

3

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

230
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 438

LEVEL 1

55

13%

LEVEL 2

153

35%

LEVEL 3

141

32%

LEVEL 4

89

20%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

151
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 300

LEVEL 1

29

10%

LEVEL 2

120

40%

LEVEL 3

109

36%

LEVEL 4

42

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

13
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

13

30%

LEVEL 2

18

41%

LEVEL 3

9

20%

LEVEL 4

4

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

20
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

14

25%

LEVEL 2

23

40%

LEVEL 3

15

26%

LEVEL 4

5

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.