Skip to Content
Main content

ALDEN TERRACE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

83
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

49

21%

LEVEL 2

100

43%

LEVEL 3

63

27%

LEVEL 4

20

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

89
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

32

15%

LEVEL 2

93

43%

LEVEL 3

65

30%

LEVEL 4

24

11%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

40
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 114

LEVEL 1

24

21%

LEVEL 2

50

44%

LEVEL 3

30

26%

LEVEL 4

10

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

43
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

13

13%

LEVEL 2

45

45%

LEVEL 3

29

29%

LEVEL 4

14

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

43
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

25

21%

LEVEL 2

50

42%

LEVEL 3

33

28%

LEVEL 4

10

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

46
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

19

17%

LEVEL 2

48

42%

LEVEL 3

36

32%

LEVEL 4

10

9%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

19
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

12

27%

LEVEL 2

14

31%

LEVEL 3

12

27%

LEVEL 4

7

16%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

14
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

4

11%

LEVEL 2

19

51%

LEVEL 3

10

27%

LEVEL 4

4

11%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

55
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

27

17%

LEVEL 2

75

48%

LEVEL 3

45

29%

LEVEL 4

10

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

69
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

23

15%

LEVEL 2

58

39%

LEVEL 3

51

34%

LEVEL 4

18

12%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

7

32%

LEVEL 2

9

41%

LEVEL 3

4

18%

LEVEL 4

2

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

2

10%

LEVEL 2

14

70%

LEVEL 3

3

15%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

82
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

39

18%

LEVEL 2

94

44%

LEVEL 3

62

29%

LEVEL 4

20

9%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

89
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 204

LEVEL 1

26

13%

LEVEL 2

89

44%

LEVEL 3

65

32%

LEVEL 4

24

12%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

10

59%

LEVEL 2

6

35%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

6

60%

LEVEL 2

4

40%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

83
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

45

20%

LEVEL 2

99

44%

LEVEL 3

63

28%

LEVEL 4

20

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

89
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

31

15%

LEVEL 2

87

42%

LEVEL 3

65

31%

LEVEL 4

24

12%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

4

80%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

6

86%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

42
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

15

14%

LEVEL 2

53

48%

LEVEL 3

33

30%

LEVEL 4

9

8%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

48
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

6

6%

LEVEL 2

39

42%

LEVEL 3

32

34%

LEVEL 4

16

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

41
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 122

LEVEL 1

34

28%

LEVEL 2

47

39%

LEVEL 3

30

25%

LEVEL 4

11

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

41
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

26

21%

LEVEL 2

54

45%

LEVEL 3

33

27%

LEVEL 4

8

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.