Skip to Content
Main content

HOWARD T HERBER MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

115
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 364

LEVEL 1

88

24%

LEVEL 2

161

44%

LEVEL 3

81

22%

LEVEL 4

34

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

85
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

72

29%

LEVEL 2

92

37%

LEVEL 3

60

24%

LEVEL 4

25

10%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

67
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

31

19%

LEVEL 2

67

41%

LEVEL 3

50

30%

LEVEL 4

17

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

44
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

17

17%

LEVEL 2

41

40%

LEVEL 3

29

28%

LEVEL 4

15

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

48
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

57

29%

LEVEL 2

94

47%

LEVEL 3

31

16%

LEVEL 4

17

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

41
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

55

37%

LEVEL 2

51

35%

LEVEL 3

31

21%

LEVEL 4

10

7%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

32
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

10

16%

LEVEL 2

22

34%

LEVEL 3

22

34%

LEVEL 4

10

16%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

20
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

8

21%

LEVEL 2

11

28%

LEVEL 3

12

31%

LEVEL 4

8

21%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

49
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

57

29%

LEVEL 2

91

46%

LEVEL 3

38

19%

LEVEL 4

11

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

38
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

42

32%

LEVEL 2

50

38%

LEVEL 3

29

22%

LEVEL 4

9

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

20
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

18

23%

LEVEL 2

39

51%

LEVEL 3

16

21%

LEVEL 4

4

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

16
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

18

30%

LEVEL 2

27

44%

LEVEL 3

11

18%

LEVEL 4

5

8%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

111
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 299

LEVEL 1

48

16%

LEVEL 2

140

47%

LEVEL 3

77

26%

LEVEL 4

34

11%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

83
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

35

18%

LEVEL 2

81

41%

LEVEL 3

58

29%

LEVEL 4

25

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

40

62%

LEVEL 2

21

32%

LEVEL 3

4

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

37

74%

LEVEL 2

11

22%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

115
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 353

LEVEL 1

80

23%

LEVEL 2

158

45%

LEVEL 3

81

23%

LEVEL 4

34

10%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

85
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

67

28%

LEVEL 2

91

37%

LEVEL 3

60

25%

LEVEL 4

25

10%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

8

73%

LEVEL 2

3

27%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

5

83%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

82
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

30

16%

LEVEL 2

79

41%

LEVEL 3

54

28%

LEVEL 4

28

15%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

51
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

28

20%

LEVEL 2

58

42%

LEVEL 3

36

26%

LEVEL 4

15

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

33
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

58

34%

LEVEL 2

82

47%

LEVEL 3

27

16%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

34
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 112

LEVEL 1

44

39%

LEVEL 2

34

30%

LEVEL 3

24

21%

LEVEL 4

10

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.