Skip to Content
Main content

CALIFORNIA AVENUE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

72
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 356

LEVEL 1

131

37%

LEVEL 2

153

43%

LEVEL 3

58

16%

LEVEL 4

14

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

74
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 313

LEVEL 1

120

38%

LEVEL 2

119

38%

LEVEL 3

65

21%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

44
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

59

32%

LEVEL 2

79

43%

LEVEL 3

35

19%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

42
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

62

38%

LEVEL 2

60

37%

LEVEL 3

38

23%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

28
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

72

41%

LEVEL 2

74

43%

LEVEL 3

23

13%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

32
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

58

39%

LEVEL 2

59

40%

LEVEL 3

27

18%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

2

18%

LEVEL 2

5

45%

LEVEL 3

2

18%

LEVEL 4

2

18%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

41
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

62

36%

LEVEL 2

69

40%

LEVEL 3

33

19%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

33
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 123

LEVEL 1

51

41%

LEVEL 2

39

32%

LEVEL 3

30

24%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

26
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

64

38%

LEVEL 2

77

46%

LEVEL 3

23

14%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

35
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

67

37%

LEVEL 2

78

43%

LEVEL 3

31

17%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

72
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 323

LEVEL 1

103

32%

LEVEL 2

148

46%

LEVEL 3

58

18%

LEVEL 4

14

4%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

74
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 287

LEVEL 1

95

33%

LEVEL 2

118

41%

LEVEL 3

65

23%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

28

85%

LEVEL 2

5

15%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

25

96%

LEVEL 2

1

4%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

70
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 310

LEVEL 1

92

30%

LEVEL 2

148

48%

LEVEL 3

57

18%

LEVEL 4

13

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

74
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 272

LEVEL 1

87

32%

LEVEL 2

111

41%

LEVEL 3

65

24%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

39

85%

LEVEL 2

5

11%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

33

80%

LEVEL 2

8

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

28
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 85

LEVEL 1

20

24%

LEVEL 2

37

44%

LEVEL 3

22

26%

LEVEL 4

6

7%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

23
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

14

24%

LEVEL 2

21

36%

LEVEL 3

20

34%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

44
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

111

41%

LEVEL 2

116

43%

LEVEL 3

36

13%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

51
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

106

42%

LEVEL 2

98

38%

LEVEL 3

45

18%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.