Skip to Content
Main content

EAST ROCHESTER UFSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

153
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 462

LEVEL 1

139

30%

LEVEL 2

170

37%

LEVEL 3

103

22%

LEVEL 4

50

11%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

101
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 217

LEVEL 1

53

24%

LEVEL 2

63

29%

LEVEL 3

74

34%

LEVEL 4

27

12%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

86
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

56

25%

LEVEL 2

79

36%

LEVEL 3

54

24%

LEVEL 4

32

14%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

68
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 108

LEVEL 1

10

9%

LEVEL 2

30

28%

LEVEL 3

48

44%

LEVEL 4

20

19%

MALE

PROFICIENT

67
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

83

34%

LEVEL 2

91

38%

LEVEL 3

49

20%

LEVEL 4

18

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

33
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 109

LEVEL 1

43

39%

LEVEL 2

33

30%

LEVEL 3

26

24%

LEVEL 4

7

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

WHITE

PROFICIENT

134
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 373

LEVEL 1

100

27%

LEVEL 2

139

37%

LEVEL 3

91

24%

LEVEL 4

43

12%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

87
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

34

20%

LEVEL 2

51

30%

LEVEL 3

62

36%

LEVEL 4

25

15%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

13
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

13

35%

LEVEL 2

11

30%

LEVEL 3

9

24%

LEVEL 4

4

11%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

8
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

8

38%

LEVEL 2

5

24%

LEVEL 3

7

33%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

21

57%

LEVEL 2

13

35%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

151
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 377

LEVEL 1

74

20%

LEVEL 2

152

40%

LEVEL 3

101

27%

LEVEL 4

50

13%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

98
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

33

17%

LEVEL 2

58

31%

LEVEL 3

71

38%

LEVEL 4

27

14%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 85

LEVEL 1

65

76%

LEVEL 2

18

21%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

20

71%

LEVEL 2

5

18%

LEVEL 3

3

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

96
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

46

21%

LEVEL 2

77

35%

LEVEL 3

59

27%

LEVEL 4

37

17%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

69
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

21

18%

LEVEL 2

28

24%

LEVEL 3

47

40%

LEVEL 4

22

19%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

57
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

93

38%

LEVEL 2

93

38%

LEVEL 3

44

18%

LEVEL 4

13

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 99

LEVEL 1

32

32%

LEVEL 2

35

35%

LEVEL 3

27

27%

LEVEL 4

5

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.