Skip to Content
Main content

A D OLIVER MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

263
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 782

LEVEL 1

175

22%

LEVEL 2

344

44%

LEVEL 3

188

24%

LEVEL 4

75

10%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

156
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 447

LEVEL 1

107

24%

LEVEL 2

184

41%

LEVEL 3

109

24%

LEVEL 4

47

11%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

149
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 383

LEVEL 1

67

17%

LEVEL 2

167

44%

LEVEL 3

106

28%

LEVEL 4

43

11%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

95
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

44

18%

LEVEL 2

100

42%

LEVEL 3

63

26%

LEVEL 4

32

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

114
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 399

LEVEL 1

108

27%

LEVEL 2

177

44%

LEVEL 3

82

21%

LEVEL 4

32

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

61
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

63

30%

LEVEL 2

84

40%

LEVEL 3

46

22%

LEVEL 4

15

7%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

10
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

7

23%

LEVEL 2

13

43%

LEVEL 3

5

17%

LEVEL 4

5

17%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

11
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

7

29%

LEVEL 2

6

25%

LEVEL 3

8

33%

LEVEL 4

3

13%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

222
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 644

LEVEL 1

134

21%

LEVEL 2

288

45%

LEVEL 3

160

25%

LEVEL 4

62

10%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

118
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 354

LEVEL 1

87

25%

LEVEL 2

149

42%

LEVEL 3

81

23%

LEVEL 4

37

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

10
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

14

33%

LEVEL 2

19

44%

LEVEL 3

8

19%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

9
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

8

27%

LEVEL 2

13

43%

LEVEL 3

5

17%

LEVEL 4

4

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

14
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

19

35%

LEVEL 2

21

39%

LEVEL 3

10

19%

LEVEL 4

4

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

14
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

5

15%

LEVEL 2

14

42%

LEVEL 3

11

33%

LEVEL 4

3

9%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

260
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 696

LEVEL 1

107

15%

LEVEL 2

329

47%

LEVEL 3

185

27%

LEVEL 4

75

11%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

154
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 401

LEVEL 1

70

17%

LEVEL 2

177

44%

LEVEL 3

107

27%

LEVEL 4

47

12%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

68

79%

LEVEL 2

15

17%

LEVEL 3

3

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

37

80%

LEVEL 2

7

15%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

199
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 475

LEVEL 1

71

15%

LEVEL 2

205

43%

LEVEL 3

134

28%

LEVEL 4

65

14%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

114
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 264

LEVEL 1

43

16%

LEVEL 2

107

41%

LEVEL 3

78

30%

LEVEL 4

36

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

64
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 307

LEVEL 1

104

34%

LEVEL 2

139

45%

LEVEL 3

54

18%

LEVEL 4

10

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

42
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 183

LEVEL 1

64

35%

LEVEL 2

77

42%

LEVEL 3

31

17%

LEVEL 4

11

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.