Skip to Content
Main content

WILLINK MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

450
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 935

LEVEL 1

137

15%

LEVEL 2

348

37%

LEVEL 3

308

33%

LEVEL 4

142

15%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

198
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 402

LEVEL 1

64

16%

LEVEL 2

140

35%

LEVEL 3

141

35%

LEVEL 4

57

14%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

254
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 442

LEVEL 1

39

9%

LEVEL 2

149

34%

LEVEL 3

165

37%

LEVEL 4

89

20%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

118
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

11

6%

LEVEL 2

47

27%

LEVEL 3

80

45%

LEVEL 4

38

22%

MALE

PROFICIENT

196
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 493

LEVEL 1

98

20%

LEVEL 2

199

40%

LEVEL 3

143

29%

LEVEL 4

53

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

80
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 226

LEVEL 1

53

23%

LEVEL 2

93

41%

LEVEL 3

61

27%

LEVEL 4

19

8%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

14
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

2

9%

LEVEL 2

7

30%

LEVEL 3

8

35%

LEVEL 4

6

26%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

8
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

4

25%

LEVEL 2

4

25%

LEVEL 3

6

38%

LEVEL 4

2

13%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

412
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 837

LEVEL 1

111

13%

LEVEL 2

314

38%

LEVEL 3

280

33%

LEVEL 4

132

16%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

182
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 351

LEVEL 1

48

14%

LEVEL 2

121

34%

LEVEL 3

129

37%

LEVEL 4

53

15%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

7

33%

LEVEL 2

9

43%

LEVEL 3

5

24%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

2

17%

LEVEL 2

6

50%

LEVEL 3

4

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

17
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

13

28%

LEVEL 2

16

35%

LEVEL 3

14

30%

LEVEL 4

3

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

7

39%

LEVEL 2

8

44%

LEVEL 3

2

11%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

444
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 842

LEVEL 1

74

9%

LEVEL 2

324

38%

LEVEL 3

302

36%

LEVEL 4

142

17%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

193
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 366

LEVEL 1

42

11%

LEVEL 2

131

36%

LEVEL 3

137

37%

LEVEL 4

56

15%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

63

68%

LEVEL 2

24

26%

LEVEL 3

6

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

22

61%

LEVEL 2

9

25%

LEVEL 3

4

11%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

427
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 803

LEVEL 1

85

11%

LEVEL 2

291

36%

LEVEL 3

290

36%

LEVEL 4

137

17%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

183
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 337

LEVEL 1

40

12%

LEVEL 2

114

34%

LEVEL 3

130

39%

LEVEL 4

53

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

23
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

52

39%

LEVEL 2

57

43%

LEVEL 3

18

14%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

15
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

24

37%

LEVEL 2

26

40%

LEVEL 3

11

17%

LEVEL 4

4

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.