Skip to Content
Main content

RONALD L SODOMA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

123
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 399

LEVEL 1

143

36%

LEVEL 2

133

33%

LEVEL 3

95

24%

LEVEL 4

28

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

78
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 336

LEVEL 1

148

44%

LEVEL 2

110

33%

LEVEL 3

62

18%

LEVEL 4

16

5%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

77
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

58

28%

LEVEL 2

70

34%

LEVEL 3

55

27%

LEVEL 4

22

11%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

51
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

73

43%

LEVEL 2

46

27%

LEVEL 3

41

24%

LEVEL 4

10

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

46
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

85

44%

LEVEL 2

63

32%

LEVEL 3

40

21%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

27
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

75

45%

LEVEL 2

64

39%

LEVEL 3

21

13%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

100
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 298

LEVEL 1

97

33%

LEVEL 2

101

34%

LEVEL 3

74

25%

LEVEL 4

26

9%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

64
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 245

LEVEL 1

97

40%

LEVEL 2

84

34%

LEVEL 3

48

20%

LEVEL 4

16

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

11
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

27

51%

LEVEL 2

15

28%

LEVEL 3

9

17%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

26

68%

LEVEL 2

9

24%

LEVEL 3

3

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

11
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

16

39%

LEVEL 2

14

34%

LEVEL 3

11

27%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

22

48%

LEVEL 2

16

35%

LEVEL 3

8

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

123
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 374

LEVEL 1

122

33%

LEVEL 2

129

34%

LEVEL 3

95

25%

LEVEL 4

28

7%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

78
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 314

LEVEL 1

129

41%

LEVEL 2

107

34%

LEVEL 3

62

20%

LEVEL 4

16

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

21

84%

LEVEL 2

4

16%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

19

86%

LEVEL 2

3

14%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

122
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 390

LEVEL 1

137

35%

LEVEL 2

131

34%

LEVEL 3

94

24%

LEVEL 4

28

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

78
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 325

LEVEL 1

139

43%

LEVEL 2

108

33%

LEVEL 3

62

19%

LEVEL 4

16

5%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

6

67%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

9

82%

LEVEL 2

2

18%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

71
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

38

22%

LEVEL 2

63

37%

LEVEL 3

51

30%

LEVEL 4

20

12%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

48
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

29

23%

LEVEL 2

47

38%

LEVEL 3

36

29%

LEVEL 4

12

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

52
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

105

46%

LEVEL 2

70

31%

LEVEL 3

44

19%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

30
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

119

56%

LEVEL 2

63

30%

LEVEL 3

26

12%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

121
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 385

LEVEL 1

136

35%

LEVEL 2

128

33%

LEVEL 3

93

24%

LEVEL 4

28

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

76
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 325

LEVEL 1

140

43%

LEVEL 2

109

34%

LEVEL 3

60

18%

LEVEL 4

16

5%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

2
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

7

50%

LEVEL 2

5

36%

LEVEL 3

2

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

2
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

8

73%

LEVEL 2

1

9%

LEVEL 3

2

18%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.