Skip to Content
Main content

ATTICA JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

112
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 411

LEVEL 1

135

33%

LEVEL 2

164

40%

LEVEL 3

77

19%

LEVEL 4

35

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

105
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 377

LEVEL 1

124

33%

LEVEL 2

148

39%

LEVEL 3

79

21%

LEVEL 4

26

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

69
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

45

23%

LEVEL 2

78

41%

LEVEL 3

44

23%

LEVEL 4

25

13%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

65
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

45

23%

LEVEL 2

82

43%

LEVEL 3

47

24%

LEVEL 4

18

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

43
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

90

41%

LEVEL 2

86

39%

LEVEL 3

33

15%

LEVEL 4

10

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

40
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

79

43%

LEVEL 2

66

36%

LEVEL 3

32

17%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

WHITE

PROFICIENT

106
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 400

LEVEL 1

133

33%

LEVEL 2

161

40%

LEVEL 3

75

19%

LEVEL 4

31

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

100
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 361

LEVEL 1

116

32%

LEVEL 2

145

40%

LEVEL 3

76

21%

LEVEL 4

24

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

6

67%

LEVEL 2

1

11%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

108
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 352

LEVEL 1

91

26%

LEVEL 2

153

43%

LEVEL 3

75

21%

LEVEL 4

33

9%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

102
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 326

LEVEL 1

82

25%

LEVEL 2

142

44%

LEVEL 3

76

23%

LEVEL 4

26

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

44

75%

LEVEL 2

11

19%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

42

82%

LEVEL 2

6

12%

LEVEL 3

3

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

84
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 264

LEVEL 1

68

26%

LEVEL 2

112

42%

LEVEL 3

55

21%

LEVEL 4

29

11%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

88
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

54

23%

LEVEL 2

98

41%

LEVEL 3

65

27%

LEVEL 4

23

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

28
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

67

46%

LEVEL 2

52

35%

LEVEL 3

22

15%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

17
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

70

51%

LEVEL 2

50

36%

LEVEL 3

14

10%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.