Skip to Content
Main content

CATSKILL CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

100
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 669

LEVEL 1

338

51%

LEVEL 2

231

35%

LEVEL 3

79

12%

LEVEL 4

21

3%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

75
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 468

LEVEL 1

227

49%

LEVEL 2

166

35%

LEVEL 3

59

13%

LEVEL 4

16

3%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

57
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 321

LEVEL 1

141

44%

LEVEL 2

123

38%

LEVEL 3

45

14%

LEVEL 4

12

4%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

45
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 213

LEVEL 1

82

38%

LEVEL 2

86

40%

LEVEL 3

36

17%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

43
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 348

LEVEL 1

197

57%

LEVEL 2

108

31%

LEVEL 3

34

10%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

30
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

145

57%

LEVEL 2

80

31%

LEVEL 3

23

9%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

18

60%

LEVEL 2

8

27%

LEVEL 3

4

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

14

50%

LEVEL 2

12

43%

LEVEL 3

1

4%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

80
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 466

LEVEL 1

223

48%

LEVEL 2

163

35%

LEVEL 3

62

13%

LEVEL 4

18

4%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

62
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 314

LEVEL 1

141

45%

LEVEL 2

111

35%

LEVEL 3

47

15%

LEVEL 4

15

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

51

59%

LEVEL 2

31

36%

LEVEL 3

4

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

39

63%

LEVEL 2

21

34%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

45

58%

LEVEL 2

24

31%

LEVEL 3

6

8%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

31

56%

LEVEL 2

20

36%

LEVEL 3

4

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

97
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 551

LEVEL 1

238

43%

LEVEL 2

216

39%

LEVEL 3

76

14%

LEVEL 4

21

4%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

74
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 384

LEVEL 1

153

40%

LEVEL 2

157

41%

LEVEL 3

58

15%

LEVEL 4

16

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

100

85%

LEVEL 2

15

13%

LEVEL 3

3

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

74

88%

LEVEL 2

9

11%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

99
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 651

LEVEL 1

329

51%

LEVEL 2

223

34%

LEVEL 3

78

12%

LEVEL 4

21

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

74
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 459

LEVEL 1

223

49%

LEVEL 2

162

35%

LEVEL 3

58

13%

LEVEL 4

16

3%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

9

50%

LEVEL 2

8

44%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

4

44%

LEVEL 2

4

44%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

70
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 321

LEVEL 1

137

43%

LEVEL 2

114

36%

LEVEL 3

51

16%

LEVEL 4

19

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

56
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

79

37%

LEVEL 2

77

36%

LEVEL 3

42

20%

LEVEL 4

14

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

30
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 348

LEVEL 1

201

58%

LEVEL 2

117

34%

LEVEL 3

28

8%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

19
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 256

LEVEL 1

148

58%

LEVEL 2

89

35%

LEVEL 3

17

7%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.