IROQUOIS CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

383
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 872

LEVEL 1

162

19%

LEVEL 2

327

38%

LEVEL 3

287

33%

LEVEL 4

96

11%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

221
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 447

LEVEL 1

84

19%

LEVEL 2

142

32%

LEVEL 3

158

35%

LEVEL 4

63

14%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

204
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 424

LEVEL 1

67

16%

LEVEL 2

153

36%

LEVEL 3

157

37%

LEVEL 4

47

11%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

121
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

29

13%

LEVEL 2

65

30%

LEVEL 3

84

39%

LEVEL 4

37

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

179
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 448

LEVEL 1

95

21%

LEVEL 2

174

39%

LEVEL 3

130

29%

LEVEL 4

49

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

100
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

55

24%

LEVEL 2

77

33%

LEVEL 3

74

32%

LEVEL 4

26

11%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

9
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

2

12%

LEVEL 2

6

35%

LEVEL 3

6

35%

LEVEL 4

3

18%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

4

36%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

5

45%

LEVEL 4

2

18%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

7
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

1

11%

LEVEL 2

1

11%

LEVEL 3

6

67%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

2

33%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

359
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 822

LEVEL 1

151

18%

LEVEL 2

312

38%

LEVEL 3

269

33%

LEVEL 4

90

11%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

207
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 413

LEVEL 1

73

18%

LEVEL 2

133

32%

LEVEL 3

148

36%

LEVEL 4

59

14%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

4

80%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

3

23%

LEVEL 2

5

38%

LEVEL 3

3

23%

LEVEL 4

2

15%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

3

27%

LEVEL 2

5

45%

LEVEL 3

3

27%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

380
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 766

LEVEL 1

91

12%

LEVEL 2

295

39%

LEVEL 3

286

37%

LEVEL 4

94

12%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

215
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 387

LEVEL 1

50

13%

LEVEL 2

122

32%

LEVEL 3

153

40%

LEVEL 4

62

16%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

71

67%

LEVEL 2

32

30%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

34

57%

LEVEL 2

20

33%

LEVEL 3

5

8%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

347
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 726

LEVEL 1

112

15%

LEVEL 2

267

37%

LEVEL 3

258

36%

LEVEL 4

89

12%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

192
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 351

LEVEL 1

49

14%

LEVEL 2

110

31%

LEVEL 3

135

38%

LEVEL 4

57

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

36
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

50

34%

LEVEL 2

60

41%

LEVEL 3

29

20%

LEVEL 4

7

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

29
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

35

36%

LEVEL 2

32

33%

LEVEL 3

23

24%

LEVEL 4

6

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.