CLARENCE MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

568
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,130

LEVEL 1

147

13%

LEVEL 2

415

37%

LEVEL 3

354

31%

LEVEL 4

214

19%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

483
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 866

LEVEL 1

110

13%

LEVEL 2

273

32%

LEVEL 3

312

36%

LEVEL 4

171

20%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

303
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 543

LEVEL 1

38

7%

LEVEL 2

202

37%

LEVEL 3

185

34%

LEVEL 4

118

22%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

256
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 416

LEVEL 1

25

6%

LEVEL 2

135

32%

LEVEL 3

161

39%

LEVEL 4

95

23%

MALE

PROFICIENT

265
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 587

LEVEL 1

109

19%

LEVEL 2

213

36%

LEVEL 3

169

29%

LEVEL 4

96

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

227
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 450

LEVEL 1

85

19%

LEVEL 2

138

31%

LEVEL 3

151

34%

LEVEL 4

76

17%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

1

8%

LEVEL 2

8

62%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

3

23%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

34
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

4

9%

LEVEL 2

8

17%

LEVEL 3

15

33%

LEVEL 4

19

41%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

34
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

6

13%

LEVEL 2

5

11%

LEVEL 3

18

40%

LEVEL 4

16

36%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

513
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,029

LEVEL 1

132

13%

LEVEL 2

384

37%

LEVEL 3

323

31%

LEVEL 4

190

18%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

432
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 776

LEVEL 1

95

12%

LEVEL 2

249

32%

LEVEL 3

280

36%

LEVEL 4

152

20%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

5

33%

LEVEL 2

4

27%

LEVEL 3

5

33%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

3

38%

LEVEL 2

4

50%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

9
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

4

17%

LEVEL 2

10

43%

LEVEL 3

8

35%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

12
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

3

16%

LEVEL 2

4

21%

LEVEL 3

12

63%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

562
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 989

LEVEL 1

65

7%

LEVEL 2

362

37%

LEVEL 3

350

35%

LEVEL 4

212

21%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

476
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 761

LEVEL 1

43

6%

LEVEL 2

242

32%

LEVEL 3

307

40%

LEVEL 4

169

22%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 141

LEVEL 1

82

58%

LEVEL 2

53

38%

LEVEL 3

4

3%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

67

64%

LEVEL 2

31

30%

LEVEL 3

5

5%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

532
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,020

LEVEL 1

110

11%

LEVEL 2

378

37%

LEVEL 3

329

32%

LEVEL 4

203

20%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

458
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 775

LEVEL 1

79

10%

LEVEL 2

238

31%

LEVEL 3

294

38%

LEVEL 4

164

21%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

36
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

37

34%

LEVEL 2

37

34%

LEVEL 3

25

23%

LEVEL 4

11

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

25
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

31

34%

LEVEL 2

35

38%

LEVEL 3

18

20%

LEVEL 4

7

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.